Showing posts with label Proxy war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Proxy war. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 13, 2023

The vultures waiting behind the camera while the puppet masters & ventriloquists work behind the scenes.

The vultures waiting behind the camera while the puppet masters & ventriloquists work behind the scenes.

Greg Krasovsky

June 13, 2023

What's worse, taking a photograph of an injured person, even a child, or a dead body in a war zone or a disaster area

- primarily for the sake of photojournalism without providing available assistance (medical care, food, protection [from animal or human predators], shelter and/or evacuation)

   or

- for propaganda / information warfare / fake news? 

Sadly, I've seen a lot of "vulture" photo & video news coverage from Ukraine since the winter of 2013-2014 and the start of the civil war in Eastern Ukraine in the spring of 2014.
 
Some photos and video segments have been staged and faked.

What's worse, the vast majority of it has been by Ukrainian and Western news media.

This is based on my objective neutral observations and analysis.

So why did these Ukrainian and Western media journalists and news outlets violate the precepts of objective journalism, aside from being owned & controlled by establishment financial industrial groups that in turn control governments, political parties and politicians?
 
To arouse sympathy in The Americas, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand for the Pro-American Ukrainian government, even when its military, security & law enforcement agencies, paramilitaries and mercenaries commit human rights violations, including war crimes and crimes against humanity.
 
And to arouse anger and hate against Pro-Russian Ukrainian citizens and Russia, as the country that provided them with military, economic, political and humanitarian assistance from 2014 to 2022 and then invaded Ukraine in February of 2022 to protect them and Russia's national security interests against NATO encroachment.
 
That's modern mainstream journalism today.

Show what's needed to arouse support for your sponsors' policies

Ignore, censor and shadow ban all inconvenient truths
 
What do you think?
 
***
 


Tobechukwu Ugwu

Facebook
June 11, 2023 at 11:53 AM

πŸ’₯ THE SECOND VULTURE:

"I PUT IT TO YOU THAT THERE WERE TWO VULTURES ON THAT DAY, ONE HAD A CAMERA"

In the 1990's there was a widely circulated photo of a vulture waiting for a starving little girl to die and feast on her corp.

That photo was taken during the 1993/94 famine in Sudan, by Kevin Carter, a South African photojournalist, who later won the Pulitzer Prize for this 'amazing shot'.*

*However, as Kevin Carter was savouring his feat and being celebrated on major news channels and networks worldwide for such an 'exceptional photographic skill', he lived just for a few months to enjoy his supposed achievement and fame, as he later got depressed and took his own life!*

*Kevin Carter's depression started, when during one of such interviews (a phone-in programme), someone called in and asked him what happened to the little girl.

He simply replied, "I didn't wait to find out after this shot, as I had a flight to catch..."

Then the caller said, "I put it to you that there were two vultures on that day, one had a camera".*

*Thus, his constant thought of that statement, later led to depression and he ultimately committed suicide.

Kevin Carter could have still been alive today and even much more famous, if he had just picked that little girl up and taken her to the United Nations Feeding Center, where she was attempting to reach or at least take her to somewhere safe.*

*Today, regrettably this is what is happening all around the world.

The world celebrates stupidity and inhumane act, at the detriment of other.

Kevin Carter should have taken the girl away from that place, which will cost him nothing, yet he didn't.

Here is the inhuman posture, "he had all time to take his shot, but he had no time to save the girl's life".*

*Thus, we must all understand that, the purpose of life, is to also touch lives. So are you too a Vulture.

In whatever we do, let humanity come first, before what we stand to gain out of the situation.

In all we do let's always think of others and how we can be of benefit to humanity, how we can lend a helping hand and wipe away tears.

Hence, when we seek knowledge, wealth, fame, skills or even positions, let's think of how we can use it to benefit the people and society at large.*

*Today, there is a lot of poverty in the land, so if our God Almighty has blessed you, be a blessing to others, extend a helping hand to those in need.

Remember, you giving, is also a way of appreciating divine blessings, bounties, and favour of God Almighty upon you.

Therefore, it is very important that we all should help the poor and needy, the orphans and widows amongst us, so that they can meet their needs.

Please don't be a Kevin Carter, be human and think humanity.*

πŸ’₯ Beware, we humans are not humans, if we lack humaneness in all we do‼️

https://www.facebook.com/SUNNEWS22/posts/pfbid0HLEkN13SJZFTY6yBSby29bqoBDuPVmnYQjdDaaZ57MQnTYPsL3zZoqcmU4NTVcQzl
 
***

History In Pictures

Facebook
September 8, 2020 at 12:03 AM
 
The vulture is waiting for the girl to die and to eat her.

The photograph was taken by South African photojournalist, Kevin Carter, while on assignment to Sudan.

He took his own life a couple of month later due to depression.

In March 1993 Kevin Carter made a trip to Sudan. Near the village of Ayod, Carter found a girl who had stopped to rest while struggling to a United Nations feeding centre, whereupon a vulture had landed nearby.

Careful not to disturb the bird, he waited for twenty minutes until the vulture was close enough, positioned himself for the best possible image and only then chased the vulture away.

At this point Carter was probably not yet aware that he had shot one of the most controversial photographs in the history of photojournalism.

   “The parents of the children were busy taking food from the plane, so they had left their children only briefly while they collected the food.

   This was the situation for the girl in the photo taken by Carter. A vulture landed behind the girl.

   To get the two in focus, Carter approached the scene very slowly so as not to scare the vulture away and took a photo from approximately 10 meters. He took a few more photos before chasing the bird away”.

The photograph was sold to The New York Times where it appeared for the first time on March 26, 1993.

Practically overnight hundreds of people contacted the newspaper to ask whether the child had survived, leading the newspaper to run a special editor’s note saying the girl had enough strength to walk away from the vulture, but that her ultimate fate was unknown.

Because of this, Carter was bombarded with questions about why he did not help the girl, and only used her to take a photograph.

As with many dramatic photographs, Carter came under criticism for this shot.

The St. Petersburg Times in Florida wrote: “The man adjusting his lens to take just the right frame of her suffering, might just as well be a predator, another vulture on the scene”.

The attitude that public opinion condemned was not only that of taking the picture instead of chasing the vulture immediately away, but also the fact that he did not help the girl afterwards –as Carter explained later- leaving her in such a weak condition to continue the march by her self towards the feeding center.

However, Carter was working in a time when photojournalists were told not to touch famine victims for fear of spreading disease.

Carter estimated that there were twenty people per hour dying at the food center. The child was not unique.

Regardless, Carter often expressed regret that he had not done anything to help the girl, even though there was not much that he could have done.

In 1994, Kevin Carter won the Pulitzer prize for the disturbing photograph of a Sudanese child being stalked by a vulture.

That same year, Kevin Carter committed suicide. (story credit: BoredPanda) See less

https://www.facebook.com/HistoryInPictures/photos/the-vulture-is-waiting-for-the-girl-to-die-and-to-eat-her-the-photograph-was-tak/2758576187738339/
 
***
 
The 1994 Pulitzer Prize Winner in Feature Photography
 
For a distinguished example of feature photography in black and white or color, which may consist of a photograph or photographs, a sequence or an album, Three thousand dollars ($3,000).

Kevin Carter, a free-lance photographer

For a picture first published in The New York Times of a starving Sudanese girl who collapsed on her way to a feeding center while a vulture waited nearby.

https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/kevin-carter-free-lance-photographer

***
 
The Vulture and the Little Girl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The Vulture and the Little Girl, also known as The Struggling Girl, is a photograph by Kevin Carter which first appeared in The New York Times on 26 March 1993.

It is a photograph of a frail famine-stricken boy, initially believed to be a girl,[1] who had collapsed in the foreground with a hooded vulture eyeing him from nearby.

The child was reported to be attempting to reach a United Nations feeding centre about a half mile away in Ayod, Sudan (now South Sudan), in March 1993, and to have survived the incident.

The picture won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography award in 1994.

Carter took his own life four months after winning the prize.

This image has also been the subject of many criticisms for being a pornography of poverty.[2]

In Ayod

In 2011, the child's father revealed the child was actually a boy, Kong Nyong, and had been taken care of by the UN food aid station. Nyong had died in about 2007, of "fevers", according to his family.[1]
Publication and public reaction

In March 1993, The New York Times was seeking an image to illustrate a story by Donatella Lorch about the Sudan famine.

Nancy Buirski, the newspaper's picture editor on the foreign desk, called Marinovich, who told her about "an image of a vulture stalking a starving child who had collapsed in the sand."

Carter's photo was published in the 26 March 1993 edition.[16] The caption read:

"A little girl, weakened from hunger, collapsed recently along the trail to a feeding center in Ayod. Nearby, a vulture waited."[4]

This first publication in The New York Times "caused a sensation", Marinovich wrote, adding, "It was being used in posters for raising funds for aid organisations.

Papers and magazines around the world had published it, and the immediate public reaction was to send money to any humanitarian organisation that had an operation in Sudan."[17]

Claiming responsible ethical behaviour of photographers, publishers and the viewers of such photographs of shocking scenes, cultural writer Susan Sontag wrote in her essay Regarding the Pain of Others (2003):[18]

   "There is shame as well as shock in looking at the close-up of a real horror.
   Perhaps the only people with the right to look at images of suffering of this extreme order are those who could do something to alleviate it … or those who could learn from it.
   The rest of us are voyeurs, whether or not we mean to be."[19]

Special editorial

Due to the public reaction and questions about the child's condition, The New York Times published a special editorial in its 30 March 1993 edition, which said in part,

   "A picture last Friday with an article about the Sudan showed a little Sudanese girl who had collapsed from hunger on the trail to a feeding center in Ayod.
   A vulture lurked behind her.
   Many readers have asked about the fate of the girl.
   The photographer reports that she recovered enough to resume her trek after the vulture was chased away.
   It is not known whether she reached the center."[20]
 
Awards
 
    Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography (1994)[21][22]
    Picture of the Year by The American Magazine[23]

Aftermath

Four months after being awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography, Carter died of suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning on 27 July 1994 at age 33.[24][25]

Desmond Tutu, Archbishop Emeritus of Cape Town, South Africa, wrote of Carter,

   "And we know a little about the cost of being traumatized that drove some to suicide, that, yes, these people were human beings operating under the most demanding of conditions."[26]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vulture_and_the_Little_Girl

***


Kevin Carter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Kevin Carter (13 September 1960 – 23 July 1994)[1] was a South African photojournalist and member of the Bang-Bang Club.

He was the recipient in 1994 of a Pulitzer Prize for his photograph depicting the 1993 famine in Sudan.

He died of carbon monoxide poisoning at the age of 33.

His story is depicted in the book The Bang-Bang Club,[2] written by Greg Marinovich and JoΓ£o Silva and published in 2000.
 
Pulitzer Prize photograph in Sudan

Carter shot an image of what appeared to be a little girl, fallen to the ground from hunger, while a vulture lurked on the ground nearby.

He told Silva he was shocked by the situation he had just photographed, and had chased the vulture away.

A few minutes later, Carter and Silva boarded a small UN plane and left Ayod for Kongor.[13]

Sold to The New York Times, the photograph first appeared on 26 March 1993, and syndicated worldwide.

Hundreds of people contacted the newspaper to ask the fate of the girl.

The paper said that according to Carter, "she recovered enough to resume her trek after the vulture was chased away" but that it was unknown whether she reached the UN food center.[14]

In April 1994, the photograph won the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography.[15][16]

In 2011, the child's father revealed the child was actually a boy, Kong Nyong, and had been taken care of by the UN food aid station.

Nyong had died four years prior, c. 2007, of "fevers", according to his family.[17]

Other work

In March 1994, Carter took a photograph of the three Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging members being shot during their abortive invasion of Bophuthatswana just before the South African election.

Carter ran out of film halfway through the incident.

Eamonn McCabe of The Guardian said: "It was a picture that made nearly every front page in the world, the one real photograph of the whole campaign."[18]

Death

Four months after being awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Feature Photography, Carter died of suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning on 27 July 1994 at age 33.[19][20]

Desmond Tutu, Archbishop Emeritus of Cape Town, South Africa, wrote of Carter,

"And we know a little about the cost of being traumatized that drove some to suicide, that, yes, these people were human beings operating under the most demanding of conditions."[21]

   "I'm really, really sorry. The pain of life overrides the joy to the point that joy does not exist.
    …depressed … without phone … money for rent … money for child support … money for debts … money!!!
    … I am haunted by the vivid memories of killings & corpses & anger & pain
    … of starving or wounded children, of trigger-happy madmen, often police, of killer executioners
    … I have gone to join Ken if I am that lucky."

    — Kevin Carter, [Suicide letter]

The final line is a reference to his recently deceased colleague Ken Oosterbroek.[22]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Carter#Death

***

Friday, June 2, 2023

Should retreating military forces turn residential areas (villages, towns or cities) into battlefields?

Should retreating military forces turn residential areas (villages, towns or cities) into battlefields?

Greg Krasovsky

June 2, 2023

Headline: "Over 200 civilians killed in Bakhmut since Russian invasion began.

At least 204 people, including four children, have been killed in Bakhmut, Donetsk Oblast, since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine."

My comments:

Unfortunately, this is what happens to remaining civilians when retreating military forces turn residential areas (villages, towns or cities) into battlefields.

They can end up looking like Stalingrad, Mariupol or now Bakhmut (Artyemovsk).

Civilians end up getting killed as collateral damage by either the attacking or defending forces.

It's sad that many of the civilians who were killed refused evacuation by Ukrainian authorities because they wanted to get to Russian-controlled territory due to family, relatives and/or political views.

Unfortunately, in the current conflict Ukrainian forces (army & territorial defense units) as a rule do not permit local residents to evacuate to Russian-controlled areas.

Obviously, any intentional targeting & subsequent death of civilians from military force is a war crime, regardless of whether it's done by attacking or defending forces.

What's disturbing is eyewitness testimony by Ukrainian citizens in besieged towns like Bakhmut (can be found on various Telegram channels and Russia media) who report that Ukrainian soldiers treated them like traitors / Russian collaborators, including

- depriving them of food, water and medical treatment,

- beating, torturing, illegally detaining and killing them,

- shelling (w. mortars & artillery), bombing (from quadracopter drones) & shooting at them when they went outside for food, water, to visit neighbors & relatives in other buildings and/or when they were being evacuated by Russian troops

- after retreating, periodically shelling LNR / DNR / Russian occupied civilian residential areas seemingly just out of spite, injuring & killing innocent civilians in the process and destroying their housing & civilian infrastructure (a clear war crime).

So what comes first, the duty to protect yourself and your fellow soldiers (even at the expense of local civilians by using their housing & infrastructure) or the duty to protect local civilians (even those who may sympathize with the enemy) and their housing?

As a soldier, you not only have a duty to follow orders, but also to refrain from committing war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Your primary duty is not just to protect your country (as a political entity) and its government, but first and foremost its people, land and infrastructure.

If you're an officer in defending forces and are forced to retreat under enemy advance, shelling or bombing to a residential area, then you need to make a moral decision:

- if your unit decides to use the residential area as battlefield and civilian infrastructure (buildings, tunnels, bridges and etc.) for cover, storage and/or as fortifications (mortar & sniper nests), especially if some of the population remains, then

-- are you fulfilling our moral duty to protect our people, their land, housing and infrastructure?

-- are moral precepts observed when you pursue what amounts to a "scorched earth" policy (you don't care if the entire village, town or city turn into rubble and want the DNR /LNR or Russians take it over utterly destroyed) in what started as a civil war with foreign sponsorship & intervention?

Now let's look at attacking forces who are approaching civilian / residential areas and are taking fire from defending forces in those areas.

FYI, this is not a global questions as to whether the military conflict is justified under rules / traditions of war, international law & treaties and/or approved by other influential countries or international organizations (UN, EU, OSCE and etc.

What should the attacking forces do to protect themselves, suppress enemy fire and continue their advance?

Are they (the attackers) justified in trying to hit and destroy defender armor (tanks & armored personnel carriers), artillery & mortars, and combatants (including spotters, snipers, machine gunners, Javelin/Stinger teams and drone operators) that are located in residential areas, including houses?

What if they (the attackers) know that some of these houses or other buildings (kindergartens, schools, institutes & universities, medical clinics & hospitals, stores, key infrastructure facility buildings (electric, gas, coal, water and etc.) that are being used by defender combatants for cover or as fortifications also contains non-evacuated civilians?

Is attacking civilian residential areas and non-residential buildings being used as shelter (even if carefully to avoid or minimize civilian casualties) in such cases justified from a legal or a moral point of view?

But since everybody (below each country's president as the supreme military commander & chief), both on the defensive and offensive side, is "just following orders" and fulfilling their military oaths, is it morally & legally justified to refuse orders that needlessly endanger civilians and may constitute war crimes and/or crimes against humanity?

My humble opinion (as someone who has risked his life many times trying to protect ordinary people who were strangers as a police officer, fire-rescue technician and a paramedic) is that once you've retreated to (your back is up against) residential areas that you can no longer protect from advancing troops, including protecting the civilian residents of these areas (women, children, the elderly and other adult non-combatants), then continue your retreat (especially in a quasi-civil war) without turning these areas into a Mariupol or Bakhmut.

But who am I to talk when supposedly competent and moral military commanders & tacticians (and even their civilian political bosses) will argue that slowing down the enemy's advance is worth it if it means leaving villages, towns and cities utterly destroyed, locals left homeless, injured, maimed for life or even killed?

Especially when these moral & military geniuses

- don't live in these soon to be destroyed areas,

- don't have family & relatives there and/or have already evacuated them,

- can afford or obtain replacement housing and financial support elsewhere in the country (or even abroad),

- don't like or despise the local residents because of their ethnicity, religion, language or sympathies toward the enemy (your political opponents)

Especially when Ukraine's current political leadership

- is controlled (by money and by force, if necessary) by foreign countries and their organizations (i.e. USA, UK, EU, NATO) and

- knows that its political future (if not financial future or even life & freedom from incarceration) depends on following orders, which may surreptitiously prohibit

-- surrendering territory (even if strictly for humanitarian reasons) and/or

-- negotiating a peace settlement that would include

(i) a ban on NATO membership,

(ii) NATO troops, bases & weapons on Ukrainian soil,

(iii) fulfillment of the Minsk Accords via the Steinmayer Road Map, and/or

(iv) Stopping the persecution and providing protections & equal rights to ethnic Russians, Russian language (incl. literature, education & culture), Ukrainian Orthodox Church affiliated with the Moscow Patriarchate,

(v) recognition of some or all formerly Ukrainian territories as Russian (Crimea, DNR, LNR, Kherson or Zaporozhye regions) 

Especially when the Ukrainian government's current foreign sponsors' (US, UK, NATO, EU) politicians have already declared (even openly) that their goals in this conflict are to

- weaken Russia (militarily, economically and politically),

- isolate and contain Russian (militarily, economically, politically and even culturally),

- facilitate, cause or enact regime change in Russian (replacing Putin's administration and current Russian government with a Pro-Western one)

while disregarding the misery inflicted upon ordinary Ukrainian civilians, loss of Ukrainian lives (military and civilian), destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure and crippling of Ukraine's economy.

With all that in mind, I'm afraid to see what will / could happen soon to Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Kherson or even Kharkiv.

***

Ivan Katchanovski

Facebook
May 31, 2023 at 9:18 PM

"Over 200 civilians killed in Bakhmut since Russian invasion began." Bakhmut mayor: "Since the beginning of the war, 505 of our residents, including 17 children, have suffered mine-blast injuries. Unfortunately, 204 people died, among them four children."

https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/pfbid04hKgGc4WFuqSgqimBwbMgHmNKZmdEvAEwwQvCCSZUUcMVXucwgCsDtEFWDgTpVddl

Over 200 civilians killed in Bakhmut since Russian invasion began.

Iryna Balachuk for Ukrainian Pravda

Wednesday, 31 May 2023, 22:52

At least 204 people, including four children, have been killed in Bakhmut, Donetsk Oblast, since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/05/31/7404739/

***

[Π“ΡƒΠ³Π» ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄]

Π—Π°Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊ: «Π‘ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° российского вторТСния Π² Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚Π΅ ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 200 ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ.

По мСньшСй ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ 204 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈ Π² Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚Π΅ Π”ΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ†ΠΊΠΎΠΉ области с Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΡˆΡ‚Π°Π±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ вторТСния России Π² Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ».

Мои ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ:

К соТалСнию, это Ρ‚ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ происходит с ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²ΡˆΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ ТитСлями, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΎΡ‚ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ силы ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‰Π°ΡŽΡ‚ ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ (Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π²Π½ΠΈ, посСлки ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π°) Π² поля сраТСний.

Они ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΡ…ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° Π‘Ρ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Ρ€Π°Π΄, ΠœΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΡƒΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΡŒ ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚ (АртСмовск).

Π’ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅ граТданскиС Π»ΠΈΡ†Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ±Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π² качСствС ΠΏΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Ρ€Π±Π° Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ, Π»ΠΈΠ±ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ силами.

ΠŸΠ΅Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ· ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ ΠΎΡ‚ эвакуации украинскими властями, ΠΏΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΌΡƒ Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Ρ…ΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΡƒΡŽ России Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° сСмьи, родствСнников ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ политичСских взглядов.

К соТалСнию, Π² Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ„Π»ΠΈΠΊΡ‚Π΅ украинскиС силы (армия ΠΈ отряды Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹), ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, Π½Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ мСстным ТитСлям ΡΠ²Π°ΠΊΡƒΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ России Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ‹.

ΠžΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ любоС ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ обстрСл ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π°Ρ гибСль граТданских Π»ΠΈΡ† Π² Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅ примСнСния Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ силы являСтся Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ прСступлСниСм, нСзависимо ΠΎΡ‚ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ°Π΅Ρ‚ΡΡ Π»ΠΈ это Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΡ силами.

Π’Ρ‹Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ бСспокойство ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ†Π΅Π² Π³Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π² осаТдСнных Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ…, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚ (ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΉΡ‚ΠΈ Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Telegram-ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°Π»Π°Ρ… ΠΈ российских БМИ), ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π°ΡŽΡ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ украинскиС солдаты ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Ρ‰Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ с Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ с прСдатСлями/российскими коллаборационистами, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС

- лишСниС ΠΈΡ… ΠΏΠΈΡ‰ΠΈ, Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ ΠΈ мСдицинской ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡ‰ΠΈ,

- ΠΈΠ·Π±ΠΈΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π΅Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π·Π°Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ убийство ΠΈΡ…,

- обстрСлы (ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ Π°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ»Π»Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ), Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°Ρ€Π΄ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ (с Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²-ΠΊΠ²Π°Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΠ²) ΠΈ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ±Π° ΠΏΠΎ Π½ΠΈΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π° ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ†Ρƒ Π·Π° Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΉ, Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ, Π½Π°Π²Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ сосСдСй ΠΈ родствСнников Π² Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… зданиях ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΈΡ… эвакуировали российскиС войска

- послС отступлСния пСриодичСски ΠΎΠ±ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠΊΠΊΡƒΠΏΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ЛНР/ДНР/Россия ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ‹, казалось Π±Ρ‹, просто Π½Π°Π·Π»ΠΎ, раня ΠΈ убивая Π½Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π² процСссС ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ°Ρ ΠΈΡ… ТильС ΠΈ Π³Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ инфраструктуру (явноС Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ прСступлСниС)

Π’Π°ΠΊ Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Π΅Π΅, ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‰Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ сСбя ΠΈ своих сослуТивцСв (Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π° счСт мСстных ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΡ ΠΈΡ… ТильС ΠΈ инфраструктуру) ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‰Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ мСстных ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ (Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…, ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΡΠΎΡ‡ΡƒΠ²ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π²Ρ€Π°Π³Ρƒ) ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… ТильС?

Как солдат, Π²Ρ‹ Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ обязаны Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΎΡ‚ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… прСступлСний ΠΈ прСступлСний ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² чСловСчности.

Π’Π°ΡˆΠ° основная ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ — Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‰Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ свою страну (ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ†Ρƒ) ΠΈ Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎ, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΡƒΡŽ ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡŒ Π΅Π΅ людСй, зСмлю ΠΈ инфраструктуру.

Если Π²Ρ‹ ΠΎΡ„ΠΈΡ†Π΅Ρ€ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…ΡΡ войск ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π½ΡƒΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΎΡ‚ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ натиском ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°, обстрСлом ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π² ​​ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½, Ρ‚ΠΎ Π²Π°ΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅:

- Ссли ваш ΡŽΠ½ΠΈΡ‚ Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠΈΡ‚ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅ боя ΠΈ Π³Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π½ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ инфраструктуру (здания, Ρ‚ΡƒΠ½Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈ, мосты ΠΈ Ρ‚.Π΄.) для укрытия, хранСния ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ укрСплСния (ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ снайпСрскиС Π³Π½Π΅Π·Π΄Π°), особСнно Ссли Ρ‡Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŒ насСлСния ΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ, Ρ‚ΠΎ

-- ВыполняСтС Π»ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹ наш ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ ΠΏΠΎ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π°ΡˆΠΈΡ… людСй, ΠΈΡ… Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»ΠΈ, Тилья ΠΈ инфраструктуры?

-- ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ прСдписания, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡˆΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΡƒ "Π²Ρ‹ΠΆΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ»ΠΈ" (Π²Π°ΠΌ всС Ρ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΎ, прСвратится Π»ΠΈ вСсь посСлок, посСлок ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ Π² Ρ€ΡƒΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ ΠΈ захочСтся, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±Ρ‹ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ДНР/ЛНР ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ русскиС) Π² Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ граТданская Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Π° с иностранным спонсорством ΠΈ Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠΌ?

Π’Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΡŒ Π΄Π°Π²Π°ΠΉΡ‚Π΅ посмотрим Π½Π° Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ силы, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΆΠ°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ ΠΊ граТданским/ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹ΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°ΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ огонь ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ…ΡΡ Π² этих Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ….

К Π²Π°ΡˆΠ΅ΠΌΡƒ свСдСнию, это Π½Π΅ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ вопрос ΠΎ Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ, ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π΄Π°Π½ Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ„Π»ΠΈΠΊΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΌΠΈ/традициями Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Ρ‹, ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Π½ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ странами ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ организациями (ООН, Π•Π‘, ΠžΠ‘Π‘Π• ΠΈ Ρ‚. Π΄.).

Π§Ρ‚ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π°Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠΌ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±Ρ‹ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ сСбя, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ огонь ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ наступлСниС?

Π˜ΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‚ Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ (Π½Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅) ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡ€Π°Π·ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΡƒΡŽΡΡ Π±Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΈΠΊΡƒ (Ρ‚Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ бронСтранспортСры), Π°Ρ€Ρ‚ΠΈΠ»Π»Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ‹, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°Ρ‚Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Ρ‰ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², снайпСров, ΠΏΡƒΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ‡ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½Π΄Ρ‹ Javelin/Stinger ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ²), ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ находятся Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ‹, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ°?

Π§Ρ‚ΠΎ, Ссли ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ (Π·Π»ΠΎΡƒΠΌΡ‹ΡˆΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ) Π·Π½Π°ΡŽΡ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈΠ· этих Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… Π·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ (дСтскиС сады, ΡˆΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ‹, институты ΠΈ унивСрситСты, мСдицинскиС ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΡ†Ρ‹, ΠΌΠ°Π³Π°Π·ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹, основныС ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Ρ‹ инфраструктуры (элСктричСскиС, Π³Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅, ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅, Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ Ρ‚. Π΄.) ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°Ρ‚Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² для укрытия ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π² качСствС ΡƒΠΊΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ содСрТит нСэвакуированных граТданских Π»ΠΈΡ†?

ΠžΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π΄Π°Π½ΠΎ Π»ΠΈ Π² Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… случаях Π½Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ граТданского насСлСния ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠ»Ρ‹Π΅ здания, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅ΠΌΡ‹Π΅ Π² качСствС укрытия (Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ с ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±Ρ‹ ΠΈΠ·Π±Π΅ΠΆΠ°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ свСсти ΠΊ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠΌΡƒ ΠΆΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚Π²Ρ‹ срСди граТданского насСлСния) с ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ зрСния?

Но ΠΏΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΡƒ всС (Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ страны ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²Π΅Ρ€Ρ…ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½Π΄ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ), ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅, «ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΎ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡŽΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹» ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡŽΡ‚ свои Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ присяги, являСтся Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡŽΡ€ΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡ‡Π΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π°Π²Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ°Π· ΠΎΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π±Π΅Π· нСобходимости ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅Ρ€Π³Π°ΡŽΡ‚ опасности граТданскоС насСлСниС? ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒ собой Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ прСступлСния ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ прСступлСния ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² чСловСчности?

МоС скромноС ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π°Π· рисковал своСй Тизнью, ΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚Π°ΡΡΡŒ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ простых людСй, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ†Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π² качСствС полицСйского, ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°Ρ€Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ-спасатСля ΠΈ Ρ„Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ΄ΡˆΠ΅Ρ€Π°) состоит Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ Π²Ρ‹ отступили (вашСй спиной ΠΊ) ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Ρ‹, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π²Ρ‹ ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚Π΅ Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΡ‚ Π½Π°ΡΡ‚ΡƒΠΏΠ°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… войск, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС защищая граТданских ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ этих Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² (ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‰ΠΈΠ½, Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ, стариков ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… взрослых Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°Ρ‚Π°Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ²), Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ°ΠΉΡ‚Π΅ отступлСниС (особСнно Π² условиях квазиграТданской Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Ρ‹), Π½Π΅ поворачивая эти Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² Π² ΠœΠ°Ρ€ΠΈΡƒΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚.

Но ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎ я Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±Ρ‹ Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° якобы ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ΅Ρ‚Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ нравствСнныС Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ (ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΡ… граТданскиС политичСскиС боссы) Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‚ ΡƒΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ наступлСния Π²Ρ€Π°Π³Π° Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ стоит, Ссли это ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π²Π΅Π½ΡŒ, посСлков ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², оставлСниС мСстных ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π±Π΅Π· ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°, Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π½Ρ‹, искалСчСны Π½Π° всю Тизнь ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹?

ОсобСнно, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° эти ΠΌΠΎΡ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ

- Π½Π΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π² этих скоро Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°ΠΉΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ…,

- Π½Π΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ сСмьи ΠΈ родствСнников ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ эвакуировали ΠΈΡ…,

- ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ сСбС ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρƒ Тилья ΠΈ Ρ„ΠΈΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²ΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠΊΡƒ Π² Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΎΠΌ мСстС Π² странС (ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π° Π³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ†Π΅ΠΉ),

- Π½Π΅ Π»ΡŽΠ±ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ€Π°ΠΉΡ‚Π΅ мСстных ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° ΠΈΡ… Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ, Ρ€Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠΈ, языка ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ симпатий ΠΊ Π²Ρ€Π°Π³Ρƒ (вашим политичСским ΠΎΠΏΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°ΠΌ)

ОсобСнно ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π½Ρ‹Π½Π΅ΡˆΠ½Π΅Π΅ политичСскоС руководство Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹

- контролируСтся (дСньгами ΠΈ силой, Ссли Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ) Π·Π°Ρ€ΡƒΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ странами ΠΈ ΠΈΡ… организациями (Ρ‚.Π΅. БША, ВСликобритания, Π•Π‘, НАВО) ΠΈ

- Π·Π½Π°Π΅Ρ‚, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π΅Π³ΠΎ политичСскоС Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Π΅ (Ссли Π½Π΅ финансовоС Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Π΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Тизнь ΠΈ свобода ΠΎΡ‚ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ) зависит ΠΎΡ‚ выполнСния ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ Ρ‚Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ

-- сдачу Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ (ΠΏΡƒΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ строго ΠΏΠΎ Π³ΡƒΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ€Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ сообраТСниям) ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ

-- ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡƒΡ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΎ Π±Ρ‹

(i) Π·Π°ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ‚ Π½Π° члСнство Π² НАВО,

(ii) Войска, Π±Π°Π·Ρ‹ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠΎΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ НАВО Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹,

(iii) Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠœΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ… соглашСний Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· «Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡƒΡŽ ΠΊΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Ρƒ» Π¨Ρ‚Π°ΠΉΠ½ΠΌΠ°ΠΉΠ΅Ρ€Π° ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ

(iv) ΠŸΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ€Π°Ρ‰Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ прСслСдований ΠΈ прСдоставлСниС Π·Π°Ρ‰ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹ ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π°Π² этничСским русским, русскому языку (Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π°Ρ Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρƒ, ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Ρƒ), Украинской ΠŸΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π¦Π΅Ρ€ΠΊΠ²ΠΈ Московского ΠŸΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Ρ€Ρ…Π°Ρ‚Π°,

(v) ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ всСх Π±Ρ‹Π²ΡˆΠΈΡ… украинских Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΉ российскими (ΠšΡ€Ρ‹ΠΌ, ДНР, ЛНР, Π₯Срсонская ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ЗапороТская области)

Π’Π΅ΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π½Ρ‹Π½Π΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ иностранныС спонсоры украинского ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π° (БША, ВСликобритания, НАВО, Π•Π‘) ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ заявили (Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΡ€Ρ‹Ρ‚ΠΎ), Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΈΡ… Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π² этом ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ„Π»ΠΈΠΊΡ‚Π΅ -

- ΠΎΡΠ»Π°Π±ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Россию (Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, экономичСски ΠΈ политичСски),

- ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ русских (Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ, экономичСски, политичСски ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½ΠΎ),

- ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π³Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ, Π²Ρ‹Π·Π²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ смСну Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ° Π² России (Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° администрации ΠŸΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ Π½Ρ‹Π½Π΅ΡˆΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ российского ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΠΎΠ΅)

игнорируя ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ этом страдания простых украинских ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, гибСль ΡƒΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π² (Π²ΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ граТданских), Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ украинской инфраструктуры ΠΈ нанСсСниС ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Ρ€Π±Π° экономикС Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹.

ИмСя всС это Π² Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρƒ, я боюсь ΡƒΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚ΡŒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ скоро ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΉΠ΄Π΅Ρ‚/ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠΉΡ‚ΠΈ со Блавянском, ΠšΡ€Π°ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ, Π₯Срсоном ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Π₯Π°Ρ€ΡŒΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ.

***

Иван ΠšΠ°Ρ‡Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ

31 мая 2023 г., 21:18

«Π‘ ΠΌΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° российского вторТСния Π² Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚Π΅ ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 200 ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ». ΠœΡΡ€ Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚Π°: «Π‘ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° Π²ΠΎΠΉΠ½Ρ‹ 505 Π½Π°ΡˆΠΈΡ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС 17 Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎ-Π²Π·Ρ€Ρ‹Π²Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ранСния. К соТалСнию, ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΎ 204 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ».

https://www.facebook.com/ivan.katchanovski/posts/pfbid04hKgGc4WFuqSgqimBwbMgHmNKZmdEvAEwwQvCCSZUUcMVXucwgCsDtEFWDgTpVddl

Π‘ Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° российского вторТСния Π² Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚Π΅ ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 200 ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ.

Π˜Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π° Π‘Π°Π»Π°Ρ‡ΡƒΠΊ — срСда, 31 мая 2023, 22:52

По мСньшСй ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Π΅ 204 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ°, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС Ρ‡Π΅Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΎ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ΠΉ, Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΡƒΠ±ΠΈΡ‚Ρ‹ Π² Π‘Π°Ρ…ΠΌΡƒΡ‚Π΅ Π”ΠΎΠ½Π΅Ρ†ΠΊΠΎΠΉ области с Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΡˆΡ‚Π°Π±Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ вторТСния России Π² Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Ρƒ.

https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2023/05/31/7404739/

***