Wednesday, August 10, 2016

When they came for...

Greg Krasovsky: Today on August 10, 2014 my maternal grandmother died as a victim of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Lugansk Region of Eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Coal Basin (AKA "Donbass").

For a brief biography of her life please see a Facebook post dedicated to her 100 birthday "Today, my late maternal grandmother, Antonina Krasovskaya, (Antonina Krasowska) would have turned 100."

On the 2nd anniversary of her death I remembered "First they came ..." - a famous statement and provocative poem written by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis' rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group.
  
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. quotes the following text as one of the many poetic versions of the speech:

"First they came for the Socialists*, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist*.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

*But the quotation that's on display is a variation which substitutes "Socialists" for "Communists". 
      
So I thought about my position on war crimes since I turned 21 in 1989 and, as police officer, swore to protect the citizens of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, including my late grandmother and I put together my own personal & amateur rendition of Pastor Niemöller 's masterpiece:
   
When in 1989 and 1990 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Panama, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Panamanian.[1]

When in 1999 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Serbia, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Serbian.[2]

When between 2001 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Afghani.[3]

When between 2003 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Iraq, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Iraqi.[4]

When between 2001 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Pakistan (see The Drone Wars), I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Pakistani.[5]

When in 2011 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Libya, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Libyan.[6]
  
When between 2011 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Syria, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Syrian.[7]

When in the spring and summer of 2014 I came to believe that U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Eastern Ukraine, I debated on whether to speak out.
  
But if we don't speak out then it'll happen again and again until sooner or later it could happen on U.S. soil to U.S. citizens at the hands of their own government.

Unless we don't care if the U.S., its agents and allies commit war crimes and crimes against humanity [8] abroad against who our government unilaterally considers "bad guys" in our foreign policy or war against terror[9].
 
So a year after maternal grandmother Antonina was killed, I decided to write a letter to President Barack Obama [10].
  
When President Obama did not respond to a letter from a Washington, DC based attorney sent by U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail, I sent follow up letters to Vice-President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry. 

But I never received a single reply. 

Major Western news outlets were told not to cover the story because of national security concerns.
   
So who's left and willing to speak for the victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity in East Ukraine?
   
****

[1] See http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/15/the-invasion-of-panama/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama

[2] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia 

[3] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:War_crimes_in_Afghanistan

[4] See http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/iraq-war-crimes/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_Iraq_War

[5] See https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/22/amnesty-us-officials-war-crimes-drones
  
[6] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_during_the_Libyan_Civil_War_(2011)

[7] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War
    
[8] United States war crimes are violations of the laws and customs of war committed by the United States Armed Forces since the signing of the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. These have included the summary execution of captured enemy combatants, the mistreatment of prisoners during interrogation, and the use of violence against civilian non-combatants.

War crimes can be prosecuted in the United States through the War Crimes Act of 1996. However, the United States Federal Government does not accept the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its nationals, as the United States is not a party to the Court.[1]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes and  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_crimes
   
[9] The FBI uses the following definition for Terrorism: "The unlawful use of force or violence committed by a group or individual, who has some connection to a foreign power or whose activities transcend national boundaries, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."

Sir Peter Ustinov: "Terrorism is the war of the poor. War is the terrorism of the rich.

*********
  
August 18, 2015

Barack Hussein Obama II
President of The United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, District of Columbia

Re:      Deaths of two U.S. Citizens in Ukraine from war crimes and crimes
            against humanity during the summer of 2014.

Mr. President,

            This is a formal inquiry regarding potential involvement of U.S. politicians, government officials, employees, military officers and enlisted personnel, contractors and agents in the current Ukrainian civil conflict and the crimes of war and against humanity committed therein, including potential involvement in and/or knowledge of the deaths of two U.S. citizens in Lugansk Region, Ukraine in June and August of 2014.

            My mother, Ekaterina Krasovskaya (DOB 8/11/1941, also known as Katherine Krasowsky and Katherine Krasowska), a naturalized U.S. Citizen, died in Lugansk, Ukraine on June 3, 2014. She died from double pneumonia that could not be treated properly due to Ukraine Armed Forces’ airstrikes and other military activities in the Lugansk region.

            My maternal grandmother, Antonina Krasovskaya (DOB 4/16/1916, also known as Antonina Krasowska), a naturalized U.S. Citizen, died in the village of Khryaschevatoe, a suburb of Lugansk, Ukraine, on August 10, 2014. She died from trauma, concussion and shell shock sustained from a Ukrainian Armed Forces shell that exploded outside the house where she was staying on or about August 5, 2014.

            Based on my information and belief, the U.S. Departments of State, Defense, Justice, Health & Human Services and the CIA have been aware since last year of the fact and circumstances surrounding the deaths of my mother and grandmother in Eastern Ukraine.

            I am a U.S. Citizen of Ukrainian, Russian, and African heritage. I was born in Moscow, Russia (then the Soviet Union) in 1968 and am a Russian citizen by birth. I spent the first 4 years of my life in the Lugansk Region of Ukraine. I have lived for about 18 years in Moscow, Russia, a year in Vienna, Austria and about 24 years in the United States (Philadelphia, New York and suburban Washington, DC).  I am married to a Russian citizen of Russian-Ukrainian descent and have three children, all dual citizens of Russia and the United States. As such, I have strong ties to Russia, Ukraine and The United States.
           
            Based on my information and belief, the United States has provided extensive diplomatic, military and intelligence support to the Government of Ukraine (after the February 22, 2014 ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich) in planning, preparation, initiation, and waging of military, security and law enforcement actions against the pro-autonomy (“separatist”) political leadership, insurgents and their supporters in Eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Coal Basin (“Donbass”), primarily in Donetsk and Lugansk administrative regions of Ukraine and the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics based therein.

            Such monitoring, coordination and support was conducted & provided primarily by the United States’ diplomatic corps, military personnel, intelligence community personnel and their contractors & agents to the Ukrainian Government, Ukrainian Armed Forces (‘VSU”), the Ukrainian National Guard (“NGU”), various Volunteer Territorial Battalions (“VTBU”), paramilitary groups (e.g. “Right Sector” and “UNA-UNSO”) and Pro-U.S./EU/NATO political parties & movements,

            U.S. Government support, coordination and monitoring has also extended to Ukraine’s intelligence, security and law enforcement agencies, including The Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine (“SZRU”), The Security Service of Ukraine (“SBU”) and The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (“MZS”).

            VSU, NGU and VTBU, such as the infamous Aydar and Azov battalions, coordinated their activities not only with the Ukrainian Government and its SBU, but also with U.S. Government personnel in Ukraine, including Department of State, Department of Defense (NSA, DIA, USSOCOM and etc.) and Intelligence Community (first and foremost CIA) personnel, contractors and agents.

            Based on my information and belief, I am concerned that U.S. Citizens, government entities, NGOs, and private companies and/or their personnel, either directly or through their agents, may have (a) been aware of, (b) been part of a common plan or conspiracy to accomplish, or (c) participated in the execution of certain actions in Ukraine that constitute

-          war crimes,
-          crimes against humanity and other inhumane acts,
-          serious and systemic human rights violations,
-          crimes and violations of applicable state law (including the United States and Ukraine), intentional treaties, agreements and/or assurances,

hereinafter referred to collectively as “Unlawful Acts in Ukraine.” Lists of selected documented violations and applicable international law are attached.

            Such Unlawful Acts in Ukraine have been documented by international human rights groups, such as Amnesty International (London, UK), Human Rights Watch (London, UK), The Foundation for the Study of Democracy (Moscow, Russia), Information Group on Crimes Against The Person (Moscow, Russia) as well as the Russian Federation Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ “The White Book of Human Rights Violations and Principles of Rule of Law in Ukraine.”

            These publications are available online and, based on my information and belief, known to the U.S. State and Defense Departments as well as elements of the U.S. Intelligence Community, including the CIA. Their English language translations, if not available already, can be prepared for you by The National Virtual Translation Center or qualified linguists from other U.S. Government agencies.

            I believe that Unlawful Acts in Ukraine committed by the Ukrainian Government, Ukrainian Armed Forces (VSU, NGU and VTBU), Ukrainian Security Services (SBU, SZRU and MZS) and paramilitary groups either caused or contributed to the deaths of my mother and maternal grandmother last summer.

            I am also concerned that U.S. Government personnel, contractors and/or agents may have been involved in some inappropriate way or aware of such Unlawful Acts in Ukraine and did not do what was required to prevent, stop or report such Unlawful Acts in Ukraine to relevant government authorities for appropriate law enforcement, prosecutorial or judicial action.
           
            As a U.S. citizen, an attorney and a former police officer, I cannot sit and do nothing about the possibility that U.S. citizens and U.S. Government personnel may be involved in and/or promoting immoral, undemocratic and unlawful conduct in Ukraine that violates the principles upon which The United States was established as a country by our founding fathers, including the U.S. Constitution.

            Having received my undergraduate education at Columbia College, Columbia University in New York (BA in Political Science with an emphasis on regime change in developing countries), I believe that the United States cannot remain the cradle or the champion of true democracy, freedom and equality world-wide – no matter how solid or noble our geopolitical objectives – if our country is involved in systemic human rights violations, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Ukraine, the geographic center of Europe.

            Accordingly, I petition you, as the President of The United States of America, to order all relevant U.S. Government Departments, agencies and offices, including the U.S. Department of Justice & its FBI and all elements (members) of the U.S. Intelligence Community, to

  • Conduct an investigation regarding whether any U.S. Government entity, personnel, contractors and/or agents knew about, monitored, reported, approved, advised, facilitated (either actively or tacitly through failure to act), aided & abetted, conspired to commit, supported, requested, participated in a conspiracy to commit or committed themselves Unlawful Acts in Ukraine,

  • Initiate and/or support criminal prosecution, either in the U.S. or abroad, of any and all individuals, either U.S. nationals or foreign citizens, for Unlawful Acts in Ukraine to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law of the United States of America, international law and laws of all relevant countries, such as Ukraine and the Russian Federation.

  • Take all appropriate measures to ensure that, in the future, U.S. individuals and entities, both public and private, and their management, employees, contractors, agents and allies do not become involved in any of the aforementioned ways in Unlawful Acts on the territory of Ukraine, regardless of whether such Unlawful Acts are planned or committed by Ukrainian or foreigner actors.

            Please provide a response to my inquiry as soon as possible by email. Additional information and supporting documentation regarding my concerns and allegations can and will be provided upon request in separate correspondence.


Respectfully Yours,
                                               /S/
Gregory Krasovsky, Esq.
Tel: +1-703-xxx-xxxx, Email: krasovsky2015@gmail...
   
*************************************

1. List of potential war crimes.

·         Aerial Bombing and shelling of civilian residential areas.

·         Use of unlawful and inappropriate weapons in civilian residential areas

·         Refusal and/or failure to evacuate civilians prior to or during military operations.

·         Unlawful detention of civilians and their use as human shields.

·         Disruption of medical services & Destruction of medical facilities

·         Disruption of communications & Destruction of communications infrastructure

·         Disruption of transportation & destruction of transportation facilities and infrastructure

·         Disruption of Utilities (Water, Electricity, Natural Gas, Sewage and Heating)

·         Disruption of education services and destruction of educational facilities  

·         Disruption and stoppage of food deliveries

·         Disruption and stoppage of humanitarian aid deliveries

·         Disruption and Destruction of industry and commerce

·         Genocide

·         Ethnic, Linguistic and Religious Cleansing, Silent Cleansing, community violence

·         Harassment, intimidation, abuse, assault, torture, rape, manslaughter and murder of civilians.

·         Murder, Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of pro-autonomy (separatist) insurgents and supporters.

·         Unlawful means of war meant to demoralize and intimidate civilian populations (Shock and Awe, Total War, Collective Punishment and etc.)


2. List of Potential crimes against humanity and human rights abuses

·         Mass Surveillance

·         Selective prosecution

·         Unlawful or arbitrary detentions and arrests

·         Torture (including by “Enhanced interrogation techniques”)


·         Manslaughter and murder of civilians separatists and supporters (by Death Squads and use of kill lists)

·         Inhumane prison conditions

·         Hiding of prisoners (including at black sites)

·         Denial of access to legal counsel.

·         Harassment, intimidation and persecution of attorneys representing political opposition and individuals.

·         Assault, detention, torture and murder of Humanitarian workers.

·         Ethnic Cleansing.

·         Police Brutality.

·         Selective persecutions on political, ethnic or religious grounds.

·         Restriction on freedom of movement and identity cleansing.

·         Support of hate groups (Right Sector, UNA-UNSO and etc.).

·         Encouragement and support of russophobia, xenophobia and racism

·         Press censorship and persecution of opposition journalists.

·         Propaganda, disinformation and hate media


3. Interference in and deprivation of Political Rights
  
  • Unconstitutional or legally questionable regime change with covert foreign support and participation

  • Containment, harassment, suppression and elimination of political opposition, parties & movements.

  • Interference in Political Affairs by foreign-funded and backed Agents of Influence and Agents Provocateur

·         Persecution, selective detention, trial and imprisonment of opposition politicians

  • Political Assassinations

SELECTED INTERNATIONAL LAW ON WAR AND HUMAN RIGHTS

1. Treaties, Conventions and Statutes on War Crimes.

  1. 1907 Hague Convention IV Respecting the Laws and Customs of War

  1. Annex to the Convention: Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War

  1. 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare

  1. 1945 The Nuremberg Principles

  1. 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention I for the Amelioration of the Conditions of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention II for the Amelioration of the Conditions of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention III Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention IV Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War

  1. 1977 Geneva Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts

  1. 1977 Geneva Protocol II Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts

  1. 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction

  1. 1980 UN Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects

  1. 1980 Protocol I on Non-Detectable Fragments

  1. 1980 Protocol II on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices

  1. 1996 Amended Protocol II on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices

  1. 1980 UN Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects

  1. 1980 Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons

  1. 1995 Protocol IV on Blinding Laser Weapons

  1. 2000 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict

  1. 2003 Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War

  1. 1993 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction

  1. 1997 Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction

  1. 1993 Statute of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991

  1. 1994 Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994

  1. 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

  1. 2005 Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III)

  1. 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions


2. Declarations, Conventions, Covenants and Charters on Human Rights.

  1. 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights

  1. 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms)

  1. 1952 Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 

  1. 1953 European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance 

  1. 1953 Protocol to the European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance 

  1. 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. Regulations for the Execution of Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. 1954 First Hague Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. 1959 UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child

  1. 1961 European Social Charter

  1. 1966 UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

  1. 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

  1. 1977 European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism

  1. 1987 UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

  1. 1987 European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

  1. 1989 UN International Convention on the Rights of the Child

  1. 1992 European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages 

  1. 1999 Second Hague Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. 2006 UN International Convention For The Protection Of All Persons From Enforced Disappearance

 *************


Friday, July 1, 2016

75th anniversary of the July 1, 1941 Lviv Pogrom of Jews by Ukrainian Nationalists and Nazi collaborators.

Greg Krasovsky: Sadly, today is the 75th anniversary of the July 1, 1941 Lviv Pogrom of Jews by Ukrainian Nationalists and Nazi collaborators.
May the victims rest in peace and may the perpetrators receive their just punishment in the world and the next.

What's sad and scary is that the current Ukrainian government hails Ukrainian Nazi collaborators and war criminals as heroes who were fighting for Ukrainian independence. 
Apparently, this adopts the Nazi slogan of fighting against the Jewish-Bolshevik menace - including by torturing, raping and killing innocent Jewish and Polish women and children.

This is a moral dead end which will do nothing but lead to the moral decay of modern Ukrainian society and especially its youth. 
Germany has learned the right lessons by acknowledging and condemning the genocide and war crimes that the Nazis committed during World War II against the Jews and other nations. 
  
Unfortunately, modern anti-Russian Ukrainian Nationalists have not repented for the sins of their ancestors and believe that Nazi collaboration and related war crimes were justified by their fight against Stalin's Soviet Union. 
FYI, comrade Joseph Stalin was not a Jew or a Russian - he was a Georgian Bolshevik who had graduated from a Jesuit seminary and, being an anti-Semite himself, successfully purged most Soviet Jewish communists (by imprisonment, exile and execution) until his reign ended in 1952. 
As long as Ukrainian Nationalists and Nazi collaborators like Stepan Bandera are touted as heroes and their direct participation in the Holocaust is denied, Ukraine will never become the modern European Democracy that its current political leadership claims to hold as its goal to win popular support.
****

The Lviv pogroms
By Wikipedia
   
Selected Excerpts:
The Lviv pogroms were the consecutive massacres of Jews living in the city of Lwów (now Lviv, Ukraine), perpetrated by Ukrainian nationalists from 30 June to 2 July 1941, and from 25 to 29 July 1941, during the Wehrmacht's attack on Soviet-occupied eastern Poland in World War II. 
The German historian Peter Longerich and the Holocaust Encyclopedia estimate that the first pogrom cost at least 4,000 lives.[1] It was followed by the additional 2,500 to 3,000 arrests and executions in subsequent Einsatzgruppe killings,[2] and culminated in the so-called "Petlura Days" massacre of more than 2,000 Jews, all killed in a one-month span.[1][3] 
Prior to the 1939 invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union and the ensuing Holocaust in Europe, the city of Lviv had the third-largest Jewish population in Poland during the interwar period, which swelled further to over 200,000 Jews as the refugees fled east from the Nazis.[4]
   
Prior to the 1939 invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union and the ensuing Holocaust in Europe, the city of Lviv had the third-largest Jewish population in Poland during the interwar period, which swelled further to over 200,000 Jews as the refugees fled east from the Nazis.[4]
Holocaust scholar and survivor, Filip Friedman from Lviv, uncovered an official Report of the Reich Security Main Office which documented the massacre as follows: "During the first hours after the departure of the Bolsheviks [i.e. the Soviet Army], the Ukrainian population took praisworthy action against the Jews...


About 7,000 Jews were seized and shot by the [Ukrainian] police in retribution for inhuman acts of cruelty [at Brygidki and the other prisons]..." (dated 16 July 1941).[14]
    
The Lviv Pogrom of 1941: The Germans, Ukrainian Nationalists, and the Carnival Crowd
John-Paul Himka

Selected excerpts:
  
Lviv was a multinational city on the eve of World War II. In 1939 Poles formed a slight majority (157,490 of a total population of 312,231, i.e., just over 50 percent), followed by Jews (99,595 or 32 percent) and Ukrainians (49,747 or 16 percent).2 The national composition of the city changed radically during and as a result of the war: the Jews were murdered, the Poles deported, and numerous Russians immigrated.

Before war broke out, Lviv had been in Poland, but from September 1939 until the end of June 1941 it came under Soviet rule and was joined to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. It changed hands again on 30 June 1941, when the Germans took the city.

Tuesday 1 July witnessed a full-blown pogrom. For this article I am using Raul Hilberg’s straightforward definition: “What are pogroms? They are short, violent outbursts by a community against its Jewish population.”10 On this day the violence took on a more ritualized form: Jews, men and women, were made to clean the streets; 



Jewish women were singled out for humiliation; and Jews were made to perform various rituals that identified them with communism. The Lviv pogrom of 1941 drew precedents from an earlier pogrom in the city perpetrated in November 1918 by Polish soldiers and civilians; it also adopted tropes and rituals from anti-Jewish actions that occurred elsewhere in Nazi-occupied Europe.

Just as in Lviv in 1918, in Vienna in March 1938, and in various localities in Poland in September 1939, in Lviv in 1941 Jews were forced to clean the streets. The point was to make Jews, who were prominent in the free professions and in business, engage in demeaning physical work. As a Jewish survivor remarked: “What a terribly debasing feeling it was when doctors and professors cleaned the streets with shovels in their hands [...].”11 
According to a teenage girl, Germans and Ukrainians made a neighbour get her toothbrush to clean the street. They also made a Jewish man clean horse manure from the street by putting it in his hat.12 Judging by photographs, gentiles in Lviv found the Jewish cleaners amusing (see Figure 1). To some extent, the pogrom was a carnival.

One of the characteristic features of the pogrom was the maltreatment and humiliation of Jewish women. The scenes at Zamarstyniv street were photographed by a German camera crew;13 there is also a film of the abuse.14 There were some precedents for this in pogroms in Nazi-occupied Poland. 



Women were forcibly undressed in Kraków in December 1939,15 and many members of OUN, and particularly those who were to form the backbone of the Bandera movement, were in Kraków at that time, waiting out the Soviet occupation of Western Ukraine; there is no reason to suspect that they took part in these incidents, but they may well have witnessed them. In the Easter season pogrom in Warsaw in 1940 teenagers preyed on women, especially to rob them.16 

A clearer precedent for what happened in Lviv in 1941 is what happened in Lviv in 1918; Joseph Tenenbaum, who was an eyewitness to the 1918 pogrom, wrote: “Women had to disrobe and stand naked to the delight of the crude mob.”17 In Lviv in 1941 women were shoved, kicked, beaten in the face and elsewhere with sticks and tools, pulled by the hair, and tossed from one pogromist to another. 

Many of the women were stripped naked and exposed to the crowd. Some were chased through the street.18 Rose Moskowitz had a school friend who had become an active communist. A gang caught her, cut off her hair, and ran her down the street, naked, screaming. The girl went home and killed herself.19 A Polish rescuer saw “a boy like Hercules” beating a twelve-year old Jewish girl with a chain.20 Not surprisingly, rapes were also reported.

Pregnant women were hit or kicked in the stomach.22 The pogromists stripped a twenty-year-old Jewish woman, lodged a baton in her vagina, and marched her past the post office to the prison action at Lontskoho.23 The women were robbed as well.24 Róża Wagner said she even saw prostitutes with their pimps requisitioning shoes and other items of apparel from the Jewish women.25 The victims were chosen at random, as long as they were Jewish.26



Why did OUN use its militia in Lviv to organize a pogrom and round up Jews for the Germans to kill? Partially, this flowed from the anti-Semitism of the Ukrainian nationalist movement and its leaders. Yet, anti-Semitism does not necessarily translate directly into such violence. 

In fact, OUN seemed to perceive the Poles as much more important enemies than the Jews. In September 1939, when OUN acted openly and took advantage of the civil war conditions created by the Soviet invasion of Eastern Poland/Western Ukraine, OUN units killed thousands of Poles.  In summer 1941, as the Germans invaded, OUN militias and related organizations were involved in the murder of tens of thousands of Jews, but of relatively few Poles.128 

When the OUN-led Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) definitively broke with the Germans in the late winter/early fall of 1943, it focused its attention on Poles, killing tens of thousands of them. In its official pronouncements, OUN always put Russians at the top of its enemy list. 

Hence the focus on violence against Jews in the first days of the German occupation seems to be somewhat anomalous. The anomaly is most plausibly explained as an attempt by OUN to demonstrate to the Germans that it shared their anti-Jewish perspectives and that it was worthy to be entrusted with the formation of a Ukrainian state.

The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists under the leadership of Stepan Bandera provided the engine of the pogrom. It set up a short-lived government in Lviv on 30 June 1941 headed by a vehement anti-Semite. It simultaneously plastered the city with leaflets that encouraged ethnic cleansing. It also formed a militia that assumed a leadership role in the pogrom. 

Militiamen went from apartment to apartment in Jewish neighbourhoods to arrest Jewish men and women for pogrom activities at two of the prisons; they arrested Jews on the street for a third prison that was more distant from where the Jewish population was concentrated. They conveyed the Jews to the prisons and were also present there at the maltreatment and execution of Jews.

The day after the pogrom they began to work directly for the Einsatzgruppen, again arresting Jews for execution by the Germans. OUN co-operated with the Germans in these anti-Jewish actions primarily because it hoped such collaboration would facilitate German recognition of its state. OUN’s anti-Semitism made assistance in anti-Jewish violence palatable, but it is unlikely that it was an independent factor in the decision to stage a pogrom.



As to the crowd, which is what made the pogrom a pogrom, its interest was in carnival. It relished role reversal, upturning the social hierarchy—Jewish professionals on their hands and knees cleaning streets. Those who were perceived as having been in charge during the Soviet occupation were now humiliated and forced to admit their guilt in ritualistic spectacles. 

The stinking corpses of murdered political prisoners seemed to justify an apocalyptical revenge against the perceived perpetrators, namely the Jewish population. A particular conjuncture of high politics allowed the urban crowd to act out an uninhibited script of robbery, sexual assault, beating, and murder, demanding these actions and delighting in them.
  

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

FBI Entrapment Fuels Terror - FBI Introduced Florida Shooter to "Informants" - US Propaganda Operations Attract Extremist Families - Father of Orlando Shooter is Long-time CIA Asset

If even 10% of what the below articles suggest is true, then we have a serious problem that won't be solved by ant-assault weapon legislation and a prohibition on terror suspects buying guns.

This reminds one of the Fast & Furious weapons scandal (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal) and the need for strict oversight over federal law enforcement informant management and sting operations.
  

FBI Entrapment Fuels Terror, Not Stops It
June 17, 2016
  
After a torrent of multifaceted politically-motivated assumptions about the Orlando shooting which claimed the lives of 50 and left scores more injured, the extent to which the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) interacted with the suspect, Omar Mateen, before the attacks was partially revealed.

In a press conference, FBI Director James Comey would admit (emphasis added):
...the FBI’s Miami office opened a preliminary investigation, and over the next 10 months we attempted to determine whether he was possibly a terrorist. Something we do in hundreds and hundreds of cases all across the country. 

Our investigation involved introducing confidential sources to him, recording conversations with him, following him, reviewing transactional records from his communications, and searching all government holdings for any possible connections, any possible derogatory information. We then interviewed him twice. He admitted making the statements that his co-workers reported, but explained that he did it in anger because he thought his co-workers were discriminating against him and teasing him because he was Muslim.

FBI Director Comey never elaborated on just how those informants interacted with Mateen. However, examining publicly available FBI affidavits from other investigations that resulted in arrests and prosecutions, it is almost certain the informants posed as terrorists with ties to Al Qaeda or the self-proclaimed "Islamic State" (ISIS). 

In two cases that unfolded just last years, FBI informants would be revealed to have helped plan attacks with suspects, suggest to suspects that they credit ISIS for the attacks (as reported by the Intercept), and even helped them in procuring weapons and explosives before finally arresting them. 

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ru/2016/06/fbi-entrapment-fuels-terror-not-stops-it.html
  
  
US Propaganda Operations Attract Extremist Families

Seddique Mateen, the father of the Orlando, Florida nightclub shooter Omar Mateen and self-styled leader of a pro-Taliban Afghan government-in-exile in Florida, is emblematic of the American policy that permits extremist propaganda operatives to be nurtured on US soil. Since the Cold War era, the US Central Intelligence Agency has exceled in finding the most extreme Cubans, Eastern Europeans, Afghanis, Uighurs, and others to concoct and broadcast incendiary propaganda on airwaves funded by the US government.

As the late ABC News and Christian Science Monitor journalist and pre-eminent Middle East expert John Cooley so correctly observed in his book, «Payback: America’s Long War in the Middle East», when the United States replaced Britain and France as the major Western power player in the Middle East, it was repeatedly paid back for «poor judgement and often disastrous policy errors». One of the most disastrous policy errors was the decision by the Jimmy Carter administration to provide weapons and other support to some of the most radical Islamist «holy warriors» in Afghanistan. Soon, these Afghan radicals were supplemented by «Arab Legion» jihadists cobbled together from terrorist cells in Egypt, Yemen, Libya, and other countries in the Middle East and North Africa.

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/06/18/us-propaganda-operations-attract-extremist-families.html


FBI Tried to Lure Orlando Shooter into a Terror Plot in 2013

A police officer in Florida has revealed that Omar Mateen was targeted by an FBI informant in a failed attempt to push him to commit a terror attack.
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation tried to “lure” Orlando shooter Omar Mateen into committing a terror plot in 2013 through the planting of an informant in his life, revelations that raise serious questions about the FBI's indirect role in shaping the recent Orlando terror attack through its entrapment policies.

In an exclusive interview published June 15, Sheriff Ken Mascara of Florida’s St. Lucie County told the Vero Beach Press Journal that the FBI dispatched an informant to "lure Omar into some kind of act" but he "did not bite."
  
The plan, Mascara said, came after Mateen had threatened a courthouse deputy by saying he could order al-Qaida operatives to kill his family.

The FBI is known to be using similar entrapment policies when dealing with those they suspect of belonging to terror organizations or receptive to committing terrorist acts.

In a 2013 column for Mother Jones website, Trevor Aaronson, a journalist and author of “Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terror,” revealed that “nearly half of all terrorism cases since 9/11 involved informants, many of them paid as much as US$100,000 per assignment by the FBI.”

http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/FBI-Tried-to-Lure-Orlando-Shooter-into-a-Terror-Plot-in-2013-20160619-0022.html
  

The FBI, Not "ISIS," Radicalized the Orlando Shooter
June 20, 2016

As predicted, the FBI is revealed to have approached Orlando shooting suspect Omar Mateen in 2013 with informants posing as terrorists in an attempt to "lure" him into participating in a terrorist attack.
  
USA Today's TC Palm reports in an article titled, "Exclusive: PGA Village residents want answers from security firm," that (emphasis added):

The FBI launched an investigation into Mateen after Sheriff's Office officials reported the incident to the agency. As part of its investigation, the FBI examined Mateen's travel history, phone records, acquaintances and even planted a confidential informant in the courthouse to "lure Omar into some kind of act and Omar did not bite," Mascara said. The FBI concluded Mateen was not a threat after that, Mascara said.

This is in line with the FBI's practice of approaching and entrapping potential terror suspects by posing as terrorists themselves and aiding and abetting them in the planning and preparations for high-profile attacks. These undercover operations include everything from "casing out" potential targets, to the obtaining and training with actual, live explosives, to the purchasing of small arsenals of firearms including the sort of semi-automatic rifles and pistols used by Mateen during the Orlando shooting.
...
If Omar Mateen was a "homegrown terrorist," the FBI served as the gardeners.

The American public must now demand the details of the FBI's undercover work regarding Omar Mateen, as well as the truth behind any enduring ties between Robertson and the US government. If Robertson has no connections with the US government, an explanation as to why he is allowed to operate an extremist website on American soil must be provided.

For political and ideological opportunists attempting to seize upon the Orlando tragedy to uphold an example of "Islamic extremism," it is especially ironic that the facts indicate that the act of terrorism was entirely divorced from "Islam," and instead the result of America's ongoing view of terrorism as a convenient and versatile geopolitical tool, rather than a threat to genuinely combat. 

That quite literally every aspect that contributed to Omar Mateen's radicalization is directly connected to the US government itself, illustrates just who the real threat is that American's should fear - the threat within the halls of its own government - not "terrorists" dwelling beyond them. 

http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ru/2016/06/the-fbi-not-isis-radicalized-orlando.html


CONFIRMED: FBI Introduced Florida Shooter to "Informants"

It is now confirmed that in addition to two investigations and two interviews, Florida terror suspect Omar Mateen was also approached by "informants" working for the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over a period of 10 months.
   
New York Daily News in their article, "FBI spied on Orlando gay club terrorist Omar Mateen for 10 months in 2013: FBI Director James Comey," would admit (emphasis added): 
Mateen first appeared on authorities’ radar in 2013 after the security guard’s colleagues alerted the FBI to inflammatory statements he made to colleagues claiming “family connections to Al Qaeda,” according to Comey. 

Mateen also told coworkers he had a family member who belonged to Hezbollah, a Shia network that is a bitter enemy of ISIS — the network he pledged allegiance to the night of the carnage, Comey noted.

The FBI’s Miami office opened an inquiry into Mateen. 

“He said he hoped that law enforcement would raid his apartment and assault his wife and child so he could martyr himself,” Comey said. 

Nevertheless, FBI investigators investigated Mateen, who was born in New York, for 10 months. They introduced him to confidential informants, spied on his communications and followed him. They also interviewed him twice.

Informants Posing as Handlers

The significance of this cannot be understated. "Informants" in this context, according to FBI affidavits regarding similar counterterrorism investigations, refers to individuals posing as members of terrorist organizations who approach suspects, coerce them into planning and preparing for terrorist attacks, before finally aiding the FBI in the suspect's arrest before the attack is finally carried out.
...
The FBI's counterterrorism program has not made America safer. It has clearly been used to provide a steady stream of "foiled attacks" that otherwise would never have materialized - causing hysteria, hatred, fear, and division across American society. The FBI's counterterrorism program has also clearly failed monumentally to stop actual terror suspects know to them before real attacks have unfolded.

The FBI is supposed to represent an asset for the domestic security of the United States - but in reality it appears to be one of the most compromised of liabilities.
  
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ru/2016/06/confirmed-fbi-introduced-florida.html
  

ORLANDO ‘KNOWN WOLF’ Watched by FBI, Worked with DHS, Amid Crisis Actors, Drills & CI’s
  
Orlando’s Pulse nightclub shooting is said to be the largest mass shooting in American history and in less than 24 hours, investigators already determined the incident to be an “ISIS-related” attack prior to a any investigation or forensic analysis.

In this report we will attempt to answer a number of questions about a number of anomalies and unlikely coincidences surrounding this global media event.We’re told that this tragic attack was carried out by an international security firm employee turned ‘radicalized’ gunman – but is there more to the story?
  
QUESTION: Is this is another, in a long line of “Daily Shooter” events designed to evoke an emotive, polarized and highly politicized response, rather than a rational and reasoned one?
  
http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/06/16/orlando-known-wolf-watched-by-fbi-worked-with-dhs-amid-crisis-actors-drills-cis/ 
  

Father of Orlando Shooter is Long-time CIA Asset
JUNE 15, 2016

"The Orlando Shooting. Many things are just not right with this story, including the father of the alleged shooter Omar Mateen, an Afghan-American, Seddique Mateen, who is closely linked to some of the most powerful leaders and agencies in Washington DC.

Below is a photo of Omar’s father after a meeting at the US State Dept. in Washington DC where he met with “officials”, but oddly, no log of his visit is available in the public record.
...
If it wasn’t strange enough to discover that the alleged shooter, Omar Mateen, worked as a contractor for the US Department of Homeland Security, then we learned that the elder Mateen is also standing to run for President of Afghanistan and is allied with the Taliban leadership – an absolutely ideal profile for a Washington-managed, CIA controlled-opposition political candidate."
  
http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/06/15/father-of-orlando-shooter-is-long-time-cia-asset/
  
Don't forget to check out the URA Observer Facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/URA.Observer/

Dethroning Ukraine’s Oligarchs: A How-To Guide...


Greg Krasovsky's comments on Foreign Policy's "Dethroning Ukraine’s Oligarchs: A How-To Guide":

- I agree, It's bad news when an oligarchy controls the government and even the fourth estate (journalists and news media) in a country where opposition groups can be persecuted under the guise of fighting terrorism, separatism and foreign aggression.

- How can you talk about dethroning oligarchs when an oligarch is the president of Ukraine?

- the recent anti-offshore media coverage, including that on the Panama Papers, already has demonstrated the selective nature of Western "deoffshorization" anti-money laundering and anti-corruption efforts,

- For decades, if not centuries, America and its allies have supported friendly oligarchs and dictators throughout the world -- oligarchs who opposed American policy have been vilified and undermined.

If the current anti-corruption/oligarch drive is aimed primarily or exclusively at pro-Russian or anti-US/EU/NATO oligarchs, then the Ukrainian people may end up with a truly untouchable new class of oligarchs who will enjoy Western protection and indulgences.
   
- If the present breed of Ukrainian oligarchs is replaced by transnational financial groups who will benefit from privatization and government contracts (to spend moneys borrowed from foreign creditors like the IMF, World Bank and etc.) while avoiding domestic taxation by using formally legal tax avoidance schemes, then the Ukrainian people -- who at the end will be end up repaying those foreign loans from their taxes and social benefits just like the citizens of Greece -- will have jumped from the frying pan into the fire. 

- As long as Ukrainian oligarchs have a "get out of jail card," refuge and a place to stash their wealth either in the West (US/Europe), North (Russia) or even the rising East, any Ukrainian domestic anti-corruption/tax evasion/money laundering efforts will have very limited effect, especially when foreign money is allowed to seep into Ukraine's political system and buy corrupt politicians and civil servants. 
  
- Given to the reality of today's geopolitics concerning Ukraine, Ukrainian citizens, voters and taxpayers are forced to choose the lesser of two evils: supporting either pro-US/EU/NATO oligarchs and their pocket politicians or the pro-Russian variety. 
  
What is the true lesser evil is not something that Ukrainians should expect to learn from domestic and foreign establishment media or so-called think-tanks -- including Foreign Policy (a self-proclaimed "Trusted Advisor for Global Leaders When the Stakes are Highest") -- sources of information that are controlled by their own transnational oligarchs and financial-industrial groups who have their own agenda and ulterior motives for Ukraine and whatever wealth it still has.
         
Selected Excerpts:

"None of the country’s reforms can succeed while the oligarchs still rule. Here’s how to take them out.
  
Ukraine’s oligarchs are its biggest problem. If there is a single obstacle to establishing a functioning state, a sound economy, and true democratic accountability, it is the tycoons who control the country.

The oligarchs first emerged in the years following Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. They grew rich by gaining privileged access to the gas market, expropriating companies from private owners, trading with state enterprises on advantageous terms, and privatizing those same firms at pennies on the dollar. The crooked dealings that lie at the root of their fortunes give them a vital interest in keeping state officials corruptible, the economy rigged, and the rule of law weak. A world in which regulators abide by the rules, prosecutors and judges behave scrupulously, democratic procedures hold leaders accountable, and market competition works as intended is one in which the oligarchs cannot live and work.

Calls to finally stamp out their influence are growing ever louder and more numerous. But few observers have offered workable plans for doing so. With that in mind, we present a roadmap for how it can be done.
...
Western countries can help. First, they can deny Ukraine’s reprobate political class access to the billions in aid that enable it to stay in power. Far from supporting reforms, Western aid has propped up the country’s rulers and freed them from the need to build a functioning state and market economy. Continued aid will only prolong the elite’s hold on power. Assistance that bypasses the government and supports civil society should continue. And all aid could resume once genuine reformers come to power and install a government free of oligarchs and their hirelings.

Second, the West is home to the world’s two biggest offshore tax and secrecy jurisdictions, the United Kingdom and the United States. These and a slew of other tax havens in Western Europe shelter the fortunes of oligarchs and kleptocrats from Ukraine and elsewhere. If the plea-bargain strategy is to work, Ukrainian prosecutors must gain access to information about the oligarchs’ offshore holdings.Ukrainian prosecutors must gain access to information about the oligarchs’ offshore holdings. Western law enforcement agencies can assist their Ukrainian counterparts in this task.

But the first step is for the people of Ukraine to eject their political masters and replace them with competent outsiders and professional technocrats. Without this, none of the other measures we propose can succeed. It won’t happen this year. But Ukrainians are seeing as never before the necessity of replacing rather than just reshuffling their rulers. With the right leaders, a few good policies, and a little help from the West, Ukraine’s interminable reign of rot may yet come to an end."
  
Please read rest of the article at: 


Don't forget to check out URA Observer's Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/URA.Observer/

Friday, June 3, 2016

Kiev allows torture and runs secret jails, says UN.

Greg Krasovsky: Torturing terror suspects and political opponents of your regime? Secret detention facilities - black sites? 

Sound vaguely familiar? 

I wonder where the current Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) could have learned all this? The Nazi Gestapo? The Soviet KGB? 

How about the modern CIA and its allies? 

Yes, the same CIA that's currently deeply embedded into the SBU and is actively helping it to fight pro-Russian federalists (separatists) and alleged Kremlin's agents (i.e. this who actively oppose the pro-U.S. Poroshenko regime)?
   
Is this the freedom, independence and constitutional democracy that Ukrainians deserved and expected from U.S. political, economic, military and intelligence support?
  
Where's the massive press coverage from Western mainstream establishment media? 

What? You didn't know that Western mainstream media tends to cover human rights abuses in countries whose governments are in opposition to the US/EU/NATO establishment? 

That's right folks, the best "get out of jail cards" for kidnappings, unlawful detentions, police brutality, torture and extra-judicial killings are doled out by the U.S. State Department, The Pentagon, and the U.S. Intelligence Community (CIA first and foremost) to virtually ALL U.S. allies and agents who are fighting America's traditional enemies (communists & etc.) and current opponents, such as these in the Middle East

- Libya's Muammar Gaddafi and his allies,
- Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Ba'ath party supporters, anti-American Sunni Muslims and Pro-Iranian Shiite Muslim groups, 
- Syria's Bashar al-Assad and his supporters,
- Iran's government and Shia religious leadership (ayatollahs),
- Bahrain's opposition to the pro-Saudi Arabian Sunni government
- Yemen's opposition to the the pro-Saudi Arabian Sunni government
- Afghanistan's opposition to  
- Pakistan's opposition 

Why? Because although you may be a bad guy, human rights abuser/violator, torturer, rapist, kidnapper, murderer or even a war criminal, you're the means that are justified by a noble end - spreading U.S. government influence and control. Sorry, I meant freedom, democracy, the free market and globalization.
  
So getting back to European Ukraine (the geographic center of the European continent is in Ukraine!), should we be surprised if the United States and its allies allowed the same type of political repressions against anti-U.S/EU/NATO groups as in Saudi Arabia, America's staunchest ally in the Arabian Peninsula with all ensuing consequences?

Should we be scared if the United States recommends and implements in Ukraine the same type of counter-insurgency and anti-communist/socialist measures as in Latin America from the 1960s to the 1990s, like in
  
- El Salvador
- Nicaragua
- Peru
- Colombia
- Argentina and
- Chile

or the counter-insurgency tactics elsewhere around the world like in 

- post-Hussein Iraq, 
- post-Taliban Afghanistan or 
- the Philippines (against communist groups and Moro Muslim Rebel groups).
  
Should we be surprised if the US/EU/NATO turn a blind eye against ethnic, linguistic, religious and political persecution of ethnic Russians, Russian-speakers, Russian Eastern Orthodox and Pro-Russian cultural & political movements, the same way that human rights abuses have been tolerated against America's perceived opponents in the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania)?

If you're a staunch Ukrainian Nationalist who holds Ukrainian WWII Nazi collaborators as heroes and their anti-Soviet/Polish/Jewish tactics (i.e. war crimes and crimes against humanity) as justified, then you'll approve of ALL measures necessary to eradicate the Russian menace which you believe has ruined Ukraine for hundreds of years.

But if you're a moderate Ukrainian-Russian-American like me who wants to see a tolerant, independent, democratic and corruption-free Ukraine, then you'll be scared for the sake of all normal and peace-loving Ukrainians of the above scenarios.

Why be saddened and scared? Because I don't want Ukraine to go through what former Yugoslavia has experienced less than 30 years ago - a civil war where neighbors started to beat, torture, rape & kill neighbors just because they were of a different ethnicity. 
  
I don't want Ukraine to look like Iraq where neighbors killed neighbors because they were Sunni and not Shia (and vice-versa).
  
I don't want Ukraine to go through Argentina's Dirty War or the persecutions of Franko's Spain where political opponents are tortured and killed in secret prisons and their children stolen to be raised by their parents' henchmen. 

But all of the above crimes have already started to happen in Ukraine since the Euro-Maidan protests in February of 2014. For better or for worse, the majority of the human rights abuses, war crimes and crimes committed against humanity have been perpetrated by the US/EU/NATO supported Yatsenyuk/Poroshenko regime.

But the Western Political establishment, mass media and even human rights groups mostly have turned a blind eye on these crimes and abuses. Why? 
  
Is it because people believe that it's justified or even necessary to fight Russia's evil with evil?

If you believe that the persecution of legitimate & peaceful political opposition in the Soviet Union was wrong and evil, then why would you tolerate or even participate in the same type of evil in today's Ukraine, even if  it is directed (for now) just at the alleged agents and sympathizers of Russia and Stalin's supposed heir in the Kremlin? 
  
BTW, let's look at modern Russia's geopolitical forays since its founding in 1991 and look at the alleged "evil" it has caused by:

A. Former Soviet Union
- defending Abhazian autonomy in Georgia in 1992-1993 with peace-keeping troops,
- defending Ossetian autonomy in Georgia in 2008 with peace-keeping troops,
- defending Armenian autonomy in Nagorny Karabakh,  
- defending pro-Russian autonomy in Trans-Dniester region of Moldova with peace-keeping troops,
- providing military & political assistance to contain radical Islam and drug trafficking in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. 
- providing political, economic and military assistance to Pro-Russian eastern Ukrainian federalists ("separatists") in Donetsk and Lugansk.

B. Europe
- providing economic, political and military assistance to Serbia 
- providing political assistance to Greece
  
C. Middle East
- providing military support to Syria's legitimate government,
- selling arms and building a nuclear power plant in Iran

D. Latin America
- selling arms to and engaging in trade with Venezuela 
- providing military, political and economic assistance to Cuba 
   
Now let's compare this to the millions of deaths and billions (if not trillions by now) of US dollars in destroyed civilian infrastructure caused by US/NATO led or supported interventions since 1991 in
  
- Iraq
- Afghanistan
- Libya
- Syria
- Yemen

Now did "evil" Putin's Russia or the former Soviet Union cause the above conflicts and demand US/NATO foreign interventions that have created failed states? No!
    
So how can we justify, tolerate, ignore and/or go unpunished  human rights abuses, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the current Ukrainian government under the flag of fighting Russian aggression and Kremlin's agents of influence?  
  
Please remember that ANY selective tolerance of evil, tyranny and despotism by a society or its government, regardless of whether it is 

- happening domestically or abroad,
- being done or tolerated initially in a limited way on a temporary basis,
- being used to fight a "greater" evil,

will sooner or later desensitize and corrupt the tolerant observer, facilitator or accomplice and lead to a potentially lethal spread of evil like a cancer with unavoidable pain, suffering and even death to follow.  

Do we want that sort of blow-back? I hope not!
  
****

Selected excerpt:

"Ukraine’s spy agency, the SBU, is systematically rounding up and torturing suspected rebel sympathisers, the United Nations has told The Times.

Ivan Simonovic, UN assistant secretary-general for human rights, said that in some areas Kiev’s “disregard for human rights” had become entrenched and systemic and needed to be urgently addressed.

The UN report documents hundreds of cases of illegal detention, torture and ill-treatment of detainees — both by pro-Russian armed groups and by government agencies.

It draws attention to prisoner abuse and murders by pro-Russian rebel groups, but also exposes the scale and brutality of Ukraine’s government-backed torture programme..."

Please read the rest of the article at: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/world/kiev-allows-torture-and-runs-secret-jails-says-un-vwlcrpsjn
  
Don't forget to follow our Facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/URA.Observer/


Thursday, June 2, 2016

3 Facts That Will Change Everything You Believe About U.S. Foreign Policy.

Greg Krasovsky: If you want to find out or confirm the truth, always follow the money trail...'cause money don't lie, especially in global arms sales.
Selected excerpt:
"(ANTIMEDIA) The Unites States has the world’s most powerful military — and a huge budget to match it. In fact, the U.S. spends more on defense than the next seven countries’ military budgets combined. America’s navy has been branded a “Global Force for Good,” and U.S. military operations around the world are sold to the public as freedom-by-force operations (see: Operation Iraqi Freedom).
But what is the truth about America’s foreign policy? Is America truly a benevolent empire hell-bent on raining democracy-by-drone strikes around the world? To answer this question, we looked at America’s arms global deals and came to a rather disappointing  conclusion.
The United States is the largest exporter of freedom-promoting military weaponry in the world, accounting for 33 percent of total sales. This is not really surprising considering the U.S. is the world’s strongest superpower with a technological advantage in military equipment over every other country. What is surprising, however, is which countries the U.S. is exporting these arms to. The top three beneficiaries of American arms sales from 2011-2015 raise some serious red flags that may change the way people think about U.S. foreign policy."
Please read rest of this article at: http://theantimedia.org/3-facts-us-foreign-policy/
An please don't forget to check out our Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/URA.Observer/

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

Ukraine Declares War on Journalism.

Greg Krasovsky: When even The New York Times writes about press censorship, intimidation and persecution of journalists in Ukraine, you can just imagine what it's like to be a defenseless independent journalist, especially if your objective coverage appears to be against the Poroshenko regime and/or for pro-Russian eastern Ukrainian federalists ("separatists").

"KIEV, Ukraine — In July 2014, I went to Donetsk, a separatist-controlled region in eastern Ukraine, to cover the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. It was a dangerous place at the time.

The Ukrainian military and the rebels were shelling each other, and temperamental men with Kalashnikovs who had been known to kidnap journalists were everywhere.

Like many foreign reporters, I was there to relay what was happening to the remains of the downed flight’s 298 passengers and crew members.

Before I went to the crash site, I obtained accreditation from the separatists. This did not guarantee that I would be safe, but it was the only way to get past the armed checkpoints.

Now Ukraine has labeled me an accomplice in terrorism.

On May 7, the website Mirotvorets (“Peacemaker”), courtesy of anonymous hackers, published part of the separatists’ accreditation records. My name, email address and phone number were among those of more than 4,000 journalists, including freelancers like me, as well as correspondents from this newspaper, Reuters, the BBC and other outlets.

We were collectively labeled “terrorist collaborators” for gaining accreditation from the separatists.

The list’s publishers claimed not to know what the consequences would be of releasing this information, but it seemed clear that the intent was to encourage people to take action against the journalists on their own."

Please read the rest of the article at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/01/opinion/ukraine-declares-war-on-journalism.html