Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

When they came for...

Greg Krasovsky: Today on August 10, 2014 my maternal grandmother died as a victim of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Lugansk Region of Eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Coal Basin (AKA "Donbass").

For a brief biography of her life please see a Facebook post dedicated to her 100 birthday "Today, my late maternal grandmother, Antonina Krasovskaya, (Antonina Krasowska) would have turned 100."

On the 2nd anniversary of her death I remembered "First they came ..." - a famous statement and provocative poem written by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the Nazis' rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets, group after group.
  
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. quotes the following text as one of the many poetic versions of the speech:

"First they came for the Socialists*, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist*.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me."

*But the quotation that's on display is a variation which substitutes "Socialists" for "Communists". 
      
So I thought about my position on war crimes since I turned 21 in 1989 and, as police officer, swore to protect the citizens of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, including my late grandmother and I put together my own personal & amateur rendition of Pastor Niemöller 's masterpiece:
   
When in 1989 and 1990 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Panama, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Panamanian.[1]

When in 1999 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Serbia, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Serbian.[2]

When between 2001 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Afghani.[3]

When between 2003 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Iraq, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Iraqi.[4]

When between 2001 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Pakistan (see The Drone Wars), I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Pakistani.[5]

When in 2011 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Libya, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Libyan.[6]
  
When between 2011 and 2014 U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Syria, I did not speak out- 
Because I was not Syrian.[7]

When in the spring and summer of 2014 I came to believe that U.S. Government troops, agents and allies committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in Eastern Ukraine, I debated on whether to speak out.
  
But if we don't speak out then it'll happen again and again until sooner or later it could happen on U.S. soil to U.S. citizens at the hands of their own government.

Unless we don't care if the U.S., its agents and allies commit war crimes and crimes against humanity [8] abroad against who our government unilaterally considers "bad guys" in our foreign policy or war against terror[9].
 
So a year after maternal grandmother Antonina was killed, I decided to write a letter to President Barack Obama [10].
  
When President Obama did not respond to a letter from a Washington, DC based attorney sent by U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail, I sent follow up letters to Vice-President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry. 

But I never received a single reply. 

Major Western news outlets were told not to cover the story because of national security concerns.
   
So who's left and willing to speak for the victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity in East Ukraine?
   
****

[1] See http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/15/the-invasion-of-panama/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama

[2] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia 

[3] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:War_crimes_in_Afghanistan

[4] See http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/iraq-war-crimes/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_Iraq_War

[5] See https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/22/amnesty-us-officials-war-crimes-drones
  
[6] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_violations_during_the_Libyan_Civil_War_(2011)

[7] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War
    
[8] United States war crimes are violations of the laws and customs of war committed by the United States Armed Forces since the signing of the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. These have included the summary execution of captured enemy combatants, the mistreatment of prisoners during interrogation, and the use of violence against civilian non-combatants.

War crimes can be prosecuted in the United States through the War Crimes Act of 1996. However, the United States Federal Government does not accept the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its nationals, as the United States is not a party to the Court.[1]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes and  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_crimes
   
[9] The FBI uses the following definition for Terrorism: "The unlawful use of force or violence committed by a group or individual, who has some connection to a foreign power or whose activities transcend national boundaries, against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."

Sir Peter Ustinov: "Terrorism is the war of the poor. War is the terrorism of the rich.

*********
  
August 18, 2015

Barack Hussein Obama II
President of The United States of America
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, District of Columbia

Re:      Deaths of two U.S. Citizens in Ukraine from war crimes and crimes
            against humanity during the summer of 2014.

Mr. President,

            This is a formal inquiry regarding potential involvement of U.S. politicians, government officials, employees, military officers and enlisted personnel, contractors and agents in the current Ukrainian civil conflict and the crimes of war and against humanity committed therein, including potential involvement in and/or knowledge of the deaths of two U.S. citizens in Lugansk Region, Ukraine in June and August of 2014.

            My mother, Ekaterina Krasovskaya (DOB 8/11/1941, also known as Katherine Krasowsky and Katherine Krasowska), a naturalized U.S. Citizen, died in Lugansk, Ukraine on June 3, 2014. She died from double pneumonia that could not be treated properly due to Ukraine Armed Forces’ airstrikes and other military activities in the Lugansk region.

            My maternal grandmother, Antonina Krasovskaya (DOB 4/16/1916, also known as Antonina Krasowska), a naturalized U.S. Citizen, died in the village of Khryaschevatoe, a suburb of Lugansk, Ukraine, on August 10, 2014. She died from trauma, concussion and shell shock sustained from a Ukrainian Armed Forces shell that exploded outside the house where she was staying on or about August 5, 2014.

            Based on my information and belief, the U.S. Departments of State, Defense, Justice, Health & Human Services and the CIA have been aware since last year of the fact and circumstances surrounding the deaths of my mother and grandmother in Eastern Ukraine.

            I am a U.S. Citizen of Ukrainian, Russian, and African heritage. I was born in Moscow, Russia (then the Soviet Union) in 1968 and am a Russian citizen by birth. I spent the first 4 years of my life in the Lugansk Region of Ukraine. I have lived for about 18 years in Moscow, Russia, a year in Vienna, Austria and about 24 years in the United States (Philadelphia, New York and suburban Washington, DC).  I am married to a Russian citizen of Russian-Ukrainian descent and have three children, all dual citizens of Russia and the United States. As such, I have strong ties to Russia, Ukraine and The United States.
           
            Based on my information and belief, the United States has provided extensive diplomatic, military and intelligence support to the Government of Ukraine (after the February 22, 2014 ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich) in planning, preparation, initiation, and waging of military, security and law enforcement actions against the pro-autonomy (“separatist”) political leadership, insurgents and their supporters in Eastern Ukraine's Donetsk Coal Basin (“Donbass”), primarily in Donetsk and Lugansk administrative regions of Ukraine and the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics based therein.

            Such monitoring, coordination and support was conducted & provided primarily by the United States’ diplomatic corps, military personnel, intelligence community personnel and their contractors & agents to the Ukrainian Government, Ukrainian Armed Forces (‘VSU”), the Ukrainian National Guard (“NGU”), various Volunteer Territorial Battalions (“VTBU”), paramilitary groups (e.g. “Right Sector” and “UNA-UNSO”) and Pro-U.S./EU/NATO political parties & movements,

            U.S. Government support, coordination and monitoring has also extended to Ukraine’s intelligence, security and law enforcement agencies, including The Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine (“SZRU”), The Security Service of Ukraine (“SBU”) and The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (“MZS”).

            VSU, NGU and VTBU, such as the infamous Aydar and Azov battalions, coordinated their activities not only with the Ukrainian Government and its SBU, but also with U.S. Government personnel in Ukraine, including Department of State, Department of Defense (NSA, DIA, USSOCOM and etc.) and Intelligence Community (first and foremost CIA) personnel, contractors and agents.

            Based on my information and belief, I am concerned that U.S. Citizens, government entities, NGOs, and private companies and/or their personnel, either directly or through their agents, may have (a) been aware of, (b) been part of a common plan or conspiracy to accomplish, or (c) participated in the execution of certain actions in Ukraine that constitute

-          war crimes,
-          crimes against humanity and other inhumane acts,
-          serious and systemic human rights violations,
-          crimes and violations of applicable state law (including the United States and Ukraine), intentional treaties, agreements and/or assurances,

hereinafter referred to collectively as “Unlawful Acts in Ukraine.” Lists of selected documented violations and applicable international law are attached.

            Such Unlawful Acts in Ukraine have been documented by international human rights groups, such as Amnesty International (London, UK), Human Rights Watch (London, UK), The Foundation for the Study of Democracy (Moscow, Russia), Information Group on Crimes Against The Person (Moscow, Russia) as well as the Russian Federation Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ “The White Book of Human Rights Violations and Principles of Rule of Law in Ukraine.”

            These publications are available online and, based on my information and belief, known to the U.S. State and Defense Departments as well as elements of the U.S. Intelligence Community, including the CIA. Their English language translations, if not available already, can be prepared for you by The National Virtual Translation Center or qualified linguists from other U.S. Government agencies.

            I believe that Unlawful Acts in Ukraine committed by the Ukrainian Government, Ukrainian Armed Forces (VSU, NGU and VTBU), Ukrainian Security Services (SBU, SZRU and MZS) and paramilitary groups either caused or contributed to the deaths of my mother and maternal grandmother last summer.

            I am also concerned that U.S. Government personnel, contractors and/or agents may have been involved in some inappropriate way or aware of such Unlawful Acts in Ukraine and did not do what was required to prevent, stop or report such Unlawful Acts in Ukraine to relevant government authorities for appropriate law enforcement, prosecutorial or judicial action.
           
            As a U.S. citizen, an attorney and a former police officer, I cannot sit and do nothing about the possibility that U.S. citizens and U.S. Government personnel may be involved in and/or promoting immoral, undemocratic and unlawful conduct in Ukraine that violates the principles upon which The United States was established as a country by our founding fathers, including the U.S. Constitution.

            Having received my undergraduate education at Columbia College, Columbia University in New York (BA in Political Science with an emphasis on regime change in developing countries), I believe that the United States cannot remain the cradle or the champion of true democracy, freedom and equality world-wide – no matter how solid or noble our geopolitical objectives – if our country is involved in systemic human rights violations, crimes against humanity and war crimes in Ukraine, the geographic center of Europe.

            Accordingly, I petition you, as the President of The United States of America, to order all relevant U.S. Government Departments, agencies and offices, including the U.S. Department of Justice & its FBI and all elements (members) of the U.S. Intelligence Community, to

  • Conduct an investigation regarding whether any U.S. Government entity, personnel, contractors and/or agents knew about, monitored, reported, approved, advised, facilitated (either actively or tacitly through failure to act), aided & abetted, conspired to commit, supported, requested, participated in a conspiracy to commit or committed themselves Unlawful Acts in Ukraine,

  • Initiate and/or support criminal prosecution, either in the U.S. or abroad, of any and all individuals, either U.S. nationals or foreign citizens, for Unlawful Acts in Ukraine to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law of the United States of America, international law and laws of all relevant countries, such as Ukraine and the Russian Federation.

  • Take all appropriate measures to ensure that, in the future, U.S. individuals and entities, both public and private, and their management, employees, contractors, agents and allies do not become involved in any of the aforementioned ways in Unlawful Acts on the territory of Ukraine, regardless of whether such Unlawful Acts are planned or committed by Ukrainian or foreigner actors.

            Please provide a response to my inquiry as soon as possible by email. Additional information and supporting documentation regarding my concerns and allegations can and will be provided upon request in separate correspondence.


Respectfully Yours,
                                               /S/
Gregory Krasovsky, Esq.
Tel: +1-703-xxx-xxxx, Email: krasovsky2015@gmail...
   
*************************************

1. List of potential war crimes.

·         Aerial Bombing and shelling of civilian residential areas.

·         Use of unlawful and inappropriate weapons in civilian residential areas

·         Refusal and/or failure to evacuate civilians prior to or during military operations.

·         Unlawful detention of civilians and their use as human shields.

·         Disruption of medical services & Destruction of medical facilities

·         Disruption of communications & Destruction of communications infrastructure

·         Disruption of transportation & destruction of transportation facilities and infrastructure

·         Disruption of Utilities (Water, Electricity, Natural Gas, Sewage and Heating)

·         Disruption of education services and destruction of educational facilities  

·         Disruption and stoppage of food deliveries

·         Disruption and stoppage of humanitarian aid deliveries

·         Disruption and Destruction of industry and commerce

·         Genocide

·         Ethnic, Linguistic and Religious Cleansing, Silent Cleansing, community violence

·         Harassment, intimidation, abuse, assault, torture, rape, manslaughter and murder of civilians.

·         Murder, Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of pro-autonomy (separatist) insurgents and supporters.

·         Unlawful means of war meant to demoralize and intimidate civilian populations (Shock and Awe, Total War, Collective Punishment and etc.)


2. List of Potential crimes against humanity and human rights abuses

·         Mass Surveillance

·         Selective prosecution

·         Unlawful or arbitrary detentions and arrests

·         Torture (including by “Enhanced interrogation techniques”)


·         Manslaughter and murder of civilians separatists and supporters (by Death Squads and use of kill lists)

·         Inhumane prison conditions

·         Hiding of prisoners (including at black sites)

·         Denial of access to legal counsel.

·         Harassment, intimidation and persecution of attorneys representing political opposition and individuals.

·         Assault, detention, torture and murder of Humanitarian workers.

·         Ethnic Cleansing.

·         Police Brutality.

·         Selective persecutions on political, ethnic or religious grounds.

·         Restriction on freedom of movement and identity cleansing.

·         Support of hate groups (Right Sector, UNA-UNSO and etc.).

·         Encouragement and support of russophobia, xenophobia and racism

·         Press censorship and persecution of opposition journalists.

·         Propaganda, disinformation and hate media


3. Interference in and deprivation of Political Rights
  
  • Unconstitutional or legally questionable regime change with covert foreign support and participation

  • Containment, harassment, suppression and elimination of political opposition, parties & movements.

  • Interference in Political Affairs by foreign-funded and backed Agents of Influence and Agents Provocateur

·         Persecution, selective detention, trial and imprisonment of opposition politicians

  • Political Assassinations

SELECTED INTERNATIONAL LAW ON WAR AND HUMAN RIGHTS

1. Treaties, Conventions and Statutes on War Crimes.

  1. 1907 Hague Convention IV Respecting the Laws and Customs of War

  1. Annex to the Convention: Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War

  1. 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare

  1. 1945 The Nuremberg Principles

  1. 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention I for the Amelioration of the Conditions of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention II for the Amelioration of the Conditions of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention III Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War

  1. 1949 Geneva Convention IV Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War

  1. 1977 Geneva Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts

  1. 1977 Geneva Protocol II Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts

  1. 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction

  1. 1980 UN Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects

  1. 1980 Protocol I on Non-Detectable Fragments

  1. 1980 Protocol II on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices

  1. 1996 Amended Protocol II on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices

  1. 1980 UN Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects

  1. 1980 Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons

  1. 1995 Protocol IV on Blinding Laser Weapons

  1. 2000 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict

  1. 2003 Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War

  1. 1993 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction

  1. 1997 Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction

  1. 1993 Statute of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991

  1. 1994 Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda and Rwandan Citizens Responsible for Genocide and Other Such Violations Committed in the Territory of Neighbouring States, between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994

  1. 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

  1. 2005 Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Adoption of an Additional Distinctive Emblem (Protocol III)

  1. 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions


2. Declarations, Conventions, Covenants and Charters on Human Rights.

  1. 1948 UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights

  1. 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms)

  1. 1952 Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 

  1. 1953 European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance 

  1. 1953 Protocol to the European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance 

  1. 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. Regulations for the Execution of Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. 1954 First Hague Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. 1959 UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child

  1. 1961 European Social Charter

  1. 1966 UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

  1. 1966 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

  1. 1977 European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism

  1. 1987 UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

  1. 1987 European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

  1. 1989 UN International Convention on the Rights of the Child

  1. 1992 European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages 

  1. 1999 Second Hague Protocol for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict

  1. 2006 UN International Convention For The Protection Of All Persons From Enforced Disappearance

 *************


Friday, June 3, 2016

Kiev allows torture and runs secret jails, says UN.

Greg Krasovsky: Torturing terror suspects and political opponents of your regime? Secret detention facilities - black sites? 

Sound vaguely familiar? 

I wonder where the current Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) could have learned all this? The Nazi Gestapo? The Soviet KGB? 

How about the modern CIA and its allies? 

Yes, the same CIA that's currently deeply embedded into the SBU and is actively helping it to fight pro-Russian federalists (separatists) and alleged Kremlin's agents (i.e. this who actively oppose the pro-U.S. Poroshenko regime)?
   
Is this the freedom, independence and constitutional democracy that Ukrainians deserved and expected from U.S. political, economic, military and intelligence support?
  
Where's the massive press coverage from Western mainstream establishment media? 

What? You didn't know that Western mainstream media tends to cover human rights abuses in countries whose governments are in opposition to the US/EU/NATO establishment? 

That's right folks, the best "get out of jail cards" for kidnappings, unlawful detentions, police brutality, torture and extra-judicial killings are doled out by the U.S. State Department, The Pentagon, and the U.S. Intelligence Community (CIA first and foremost) to virtually ALL U.S. allies and agents who are fighting America's traditional enemies (communists & etc.) and current opponents, such as these in the Middle East

- Libya's Muammar Gaddafi and his allies,
- Iraq's Saddam Hussein, Ba'ath party supporters, anti-American Sunni Muslims and Pro-Iranian Shiite Muslim groups, 
- Syria's Bashar al-Assad and his supporters,
- Iran's government and Shia religious leadership (ayatollahs),
- Bahrain's opposition to the pro-Saudi Arabian Sunni government
- Yemen's opposition to the the pro-Saudi Arabian Sunni government
- Afghanistan's opposition to  
- Pakistan's opposition 

Why? Because although you may be a bad guy, human rights abuser/violator, torturer, rapist, kidnapper, murderer or even a war criminal, you're the means that are justified by a noble end - spreading U.S. government influence and control. Sorry, I meant freedom, democracy, the free market and globalization.
  
So getting back to European Ukraine (the geographic center of the European continent is in Ukraine!), should we be surprised if the United States and its allies allowed the same type of political repressions against anti-U.S/EU/NATO groups as in Saudi Arabia, America's staunchest ally in the Arabian Peninsula with all ensuing consequences?

Should we be scared if the United States recommends and implements in Ukraine the same type of counter-insurgency and anti-communist/socialist measures as in Latin America from the 1960s to the 1990s, like in
  
- El Salvador
- Nicaragua
- Peru
- Colombia
- Argentina and
- Chile

or the counter-insurgency tactics elsewhere around the world like in 

- post-Hussein Iraq, 
- post-Taliban Afghanistan or 
- the Philippines (against communist groups and Moro Muslim Rebel groups).
  
Should we be surprised if the US/EU/NATO turn a blind eye against ethnic, linguistic, religious and political persecution of ethnic Russians, Russian-speakers, Russian Eastern Orthodox and Pro-Russian cultural & political movements, the same way that human rights abuses have been tolerated against America's perceived opponents in the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania)?

If you're a staunch Ukrainian Nationalist who holds Ukrainian WWII Nazi collaborators as heroes and their anti-Soviet/Polish/Jewish tactics (i.e. war crimes and crimes against humanity) as justified, then you'll approve of ALL measures necessary to eradicate the Russian menace which you believe has ruined Ukraine for hundreds of years.

But if you're a moderate Ukrainian-Russian-American like me who wants to see a tolerant, independent, democratic and corruption-free Ukraine, then you'll be scared for the sake of all normal and peace-loving Ukrainians of the above scenarios.

Why be saddened and scared? Because I don't want Ukraine to go through what former Yugoslavia has experienced less than 30 years ago - a civil war where neighbors started to beat, torture, rape & kill neighbors just because they were of a different ethnicity. 
  
I don't want Ukraine to look like Iraq where neighbors killed neighbors because they were Sunni and not Shia (and vice-versa).
  
I don't want Ukraine to go through Argentina's Dirty War or the persecutions of Franko's Spain where political opponents are tortured and killed in secret prisons and their children stolen to be raised by their parents' henchmen. 

But all of the above crimes have already started to happen in Ukraine since the Euro-Maidan protests in February of 2014. For better or for worse, the majority of the human rights abuses, war crimes and crimes committed against humanity have been perpetrated by the US/EU/NATO supported Yatsenyuk/Poroshenko regime.

But the Western Political establishment, mass media and even human rights groups mostly have turned a blind eye on these crimes and abuses. Why? 
  
Is it because people believe that it's justified or even necessary to fight Russia's evil with evil?

If you believe that the persecution of legitimate & peaceful political opposition in the Soviet Union was wrong and evil, then why would you tolerate or even participate in the same type of evil in today's Ukraine, even if  it is directed (for now) just at the alleged agents and sympathizers of Russia and Stalin's supposed heir in the Kremlin? 
  
BTW, let's look at modern Russia's geopolitical forays since its founding in 1991 and look at the alleged "evil" it has caused by:

A. Former Soviet Union
- defending Abhazian autonomy in Georgia in 1992-1993 with peace-keeping troops,
- defending Ossetian autonomy in Georgia in 2008 with peace-keeping troops,
- defending Armenian autonomy in Nagorny Karabakh,  
- defending pro-Russian autonomy in Trans-Dniester region of Moldova with peace-keeping troops,
- providing military & political assistance to contain radical Islam and drug trafficking in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. 
- providing political, economic and military assistance to Pro-Russian eastern Ukrainian federalists ("separatists") in Donetsk and Lugansk.

B. Europe
- providing economic, political and military assistance to Serbia 
- providing political assistance to Greece
  
C. Middle East
- providing military support to Syria's legitimate government,
- selling arms and building a nuclear power plant in Iran

D. Latin America
- selling arms to and engaging in trade with Venezuela 
- providing military, political and economic assistance to Cuba 
   
Now let's compare this to the millions of deaths and billions (if not trillions by now) of US dollars in destroyed civilian infrastructure caused by US/NATO led or supported interventions since 1991 in
  
- Iraq
- Afghanistan
- Libya
- Syria
- Yemen

Now did "evil" Putin's Russia or the former Soviet Union cause the above conflicts and demand US/NATO foreign interventions that have created failed states? No!
    
So how can we justify, tolerate, ignore and/or go unpunished  human rights abuses, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the current Ukrainian government under the flag of fighting Russian aggression and Kremlin's agents of influence?  
  
Please remember that ANY selective tolerance of evil, tyranny and despotism by a society or its government, regardless of whether it is 

- happening domestically or abroad,
- being done or tolerated initially in a limited way on a temporary basis,
- being used to fight a "greater" evil,

will sooner or later desensitize and corrupt the tolerant observer, facilitator or accomplice and lead to a potentially lethal spread of evil like a cancer with unavoidable pain, suffering and even death to follow.  

Do we want that sort of blow-back? I hope not!
  
****

Selected excerpt:

"Ukraine’s spy agency, the SBU, is systematically rounding up and torturing suspected rebel sympathisers, the United Nations has told The Times.

Ivan Simonovic, UN assistant secretary-general for human rights, said that in some areas Kiev’s “disregard for human rights” had become entrenched and systemic and needed to be urgently addressed.

The UN report documents hundreds of cases of illegal detention, torture and ill-treatment of detainees — both by pro-Russian armed groups and by government agencies.

It draws attention to prisoner abuse and murders by pro-Russian rebel groups, but also exposes the scale and brutality of Ukraine’s government-backed torture programme..."

Please read the rest of the article at: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/world/kiev-allows-torture-and-runs-secret-jails-says-un-vwlcrpsjn
  
Don't forget to follow our Facebook page at: http://www.facebook.com/URA.Observer/


Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Baiting the Bear: Russia and NATO.

Baiting the Bear: Russia and NATO
by Conn Hallinan at CounterPunch.org
  
Greg Krasovsky: I agree with U.S. Admiral Mark Ferguson, commander of U.S. naval forces in Europe, who is cited as saying “I don’t think many people understand the visceral way Russia views NATO and the European Union as an existential threat,”.
 
Selected excerpts:

"“Aggressive,” “revanchist,” “swaggering”: These are just some of the adjectives the mainstream press and leading U.S. and European political figures are routinely inserting before the words “Russia,” or “Vladimir Putin.” It is a vocabulary most Americans have not seen or heard since the height of the Cold War.

The question is, why?

Is Russia really a military threat to the United States and its neighbors? Is it seriously trying to “revenge” itself for the 1989 collapse of the Soviet Union? Is it actively trying to rebuild the old Soviet empire? The answers to these questions are critical, because, for the first time since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, several nuclear-armed powers are on the edge of a military conflict with fewer safeguards than existed 50 years ago.
...
First, it is the silly season—American elections—and bear baiting is an easy way to look “tough.” It is also a tried and true tactic of the U.S. armaments industry to keep their production lines humming and their bottom lines rising. The Islamic State is scary but you don’t need big-ticket weapons systems to fight it. The $1.5 trillion F-35s are for the Russkies, not terrorists.

There are also those who still dream of regime change in Russia. Certainly that was in the minds of the neo-cons when they used The National Endowment for Democracy and Freedom House to engineer—at the cost of $5 billion—the coup that toppled Ukraine into NATO’s camp. The New American Century gang and their think tanks—who brought you Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria—would to leverage Russia out of Central Asia.

The most frightening aspect of current East-West tension is that there is virtually no discussion of the subject, and when there is it consists largely of distorted history and gratuitous insults. Vladimir Putin might not be a nice guy, but the evidence he is trying to re-establish some Russian empire, and is a threat to his neighbors or the U.S., is thin to non-existent. His 2014 speech at the Valdai International Discussion Club is more common sense than bombast.

Expansionist? Russia has two bases in the Middle East and a handful in Central Asia. The U.S. has 662 bases around the world and Special Forces (SOF) deployed in between 70 and 90 countries at any moment. Last year SOFs were active in 147 countries. The U.S. is actively engaged in five wars and is considering a sixth in Libya. Russian military spending will fall next year, and the U.S. will out-spend Moscow by a factor of 10. Who in this comparison looks threatening?"
 
Please read the rest of article at: http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/04/baiting-the-bear-russia-and-nato/

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Could a Bomb Blast in Ankara Change the Outcome of the War in Syria?



Greg Krasovsky: If US policy toward the civil war in Ukraine is in any way similar to US policy in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and Yemen, then Ukraine is headed toward the epicenter of a geopolitical disaster on world-wide proportions.

Why? Because Russia will act with greater response than in Syria to make sure that next-door Ukraine will not turn into a failed state that could (would!) be used by armed anti-Russian militants as a protected staging area in an attempt to overthrow Vladimir Putin's in Russia.

So let's keep an eye on Syria today, as the fates of Ukraine, Russia and America -- for better or for worse -- are intertwined in the resolution of the Syrian conflict. 

P.S. To see how things could spiral out of control, please read 

"Washington Asks Moscow: Please Do Not to Bomb American Troops Operating on the Ground in Northern Syria."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/washington-asks-moscow-please-do-not-to-bomb-american-troops-operating-on-the-ground-in-northern-syria/5509226

"Experts: Invasion of Syria Could Lead to Nuclear War"

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/02/experts-invasion-syria-lead-nuclear-war.html

******* 

Could a Bomb Blast in Ankara Change the Outcome of the War in Syria?
by MIKE WHITNEY
Counterpunch.org
FEBRUARY 19, 2016

"The question is whether Putin will engage the Turkish military in a full-blown war just to recapture a few hundred meters of Syrian sovereign territory. I expect Putin will let the incident slide and chalk it up to “frustration” on Turkey’s part. If that’s the only victory that Erdogan requires, then it’s a price that’s worth paying. Putin has to stay focused on the big picture, and not get diverted by trivialities.

Of course, if Erdogan plans to push further into Syria, then there’s going to be trouble. After all, Moscow’s hands are tied. The only way it can hope to extricate itself from the conflict in Syria is by defeating the jihadists as quickly as possible, clearing out the hotbeds of resistance, and reestablishing security. If Turkey enters the war, that throws a wrench in everything. The tit-for-tat fighting will drag on for years, and there will probably never be a clear winner. This is exactly what Putin hopes to avoid. So, if Turkey launches an invasion and sends in ground troops, Putin will be forced to strike with everything-he’s-got to see if one, big shock and awe display of raw military power is enough to reverse the trend and send Erdogan’s legions packing. If it doesn’t work, and Turkey digs in, Syria could devolve into the mother of all quagmires, which is why we’re a little surprised that Obama is not pursuing a plan that would draw Turkey deeper into the fray, after all, Washington gains nothing strategically from its support for the YPG. In a way, the alliance makes no sense. Does Washington care about Kurdish aspirations for a homeland?

No. Does Obama want to help Putin clear the area North of Aleppo of jihadists, militants and opposition forces?

Of course not. Then what does Washington get?

Nothing.

An alliance with Erdogan, on the other hand, provides Washington with the footsoldiers it needs to fight its proxy war with Russia. It also creates a situation where Russia could get bogged down for years in a conflict that could drain its resources, undermine morale, and precipitate social unrest at home. Isn’t that exactly what Washington wants?"

Please read the rest of the article at http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/19/could-a-bomb-blast-in-ankara-change-the-outcome-of-the-war-in-syria/